Cost and health status analysis after autologous chondrocyte implantation and mosaicplasty: A retrospective comparison

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 359-367

  Derrett, Sarah ^a   Stokes, Elizabeth A ^a   James, Marilyn ^a   Bartlett, William ^b   Bentley, George ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autologous chondrocyte; Cost effectiveness; Knee; Mosaicplasty; Outcome

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DEFECTS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PATIENT MONITORING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION (ACI); CHONDORAL DEFECTS; HEALTH STATUS; MASAICPLASTRY;

HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; CARTILAGE; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED CINCINNATI KNEE RATING SYSTEM; MOSAICPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREVALENCE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 23244458816     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462305050476     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Barber JA, Thompson SG. Analysis of cost data in randomised trials: An application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med. 2000;19:3219-3236.
2. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:402-416.
3. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RWJ, et al. A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:223-230.
4. Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J, Walters SJ, Snaith ML. Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38:870-877.
5. Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: A non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ. 1997;6:327-340.
6. Briggs TWR, Mahroof S, David LA, et al. Histological evaluation of chondral defects after autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:1077-1083.
7. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:889-895.
8. Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 2):58-69.
9. Brooks R, The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53-72.
10. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. Articular cartilage. Part II: Degeneration and osteoarthritis repair, regeneration and transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:612-632.
11. Chang RW, Falconer J, Stulberg SD, et al. A randomised, controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery versus closed-needle joint lavage for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:289-296.
12. Chibnall JT, Tait RC. The Pain Disability Index: Factor structure and normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1082-1086.
13. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, et al. Cartilage injuries: A review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:456-460.
14. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: Results from a UK general population survey. Discussion Paper 138. University of York: Centre for Health Economics; 1995.
15. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
16. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997: 130-131.
17. Friedman MJ, Berasi CC, Fox JM, et al. Preliminary results with abrasion arthroplasty in the osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop. 1984;182:200-205.
18. Haddo O, Mahroof S, Higgs D, et al. The use of chondrogide membrane in autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee. 2004;11:51-55.
19. Hangody L, Feczkó P, Bartha L, Bodó G, Kish G. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular defects of the knee and ankle. Clin Orthop. 2001;391 (Suppl):S328-S336.
20. Hangody L, Füles P. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 2):25-32.
21. Hangody L, Kish G, Kárpáti Z, et al. Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: Application in clinical practice. Orthopedics. 1998;21:751-756.
22. Henderson I, Tuy B, Oakes B. Reoperation after autologous chondrocyte implantation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:205-211.
23. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R. Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:185-192.
24. Jackson RW, Marans HJ, Sliver RS. Arthroscopic treatment of degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:332.
25. Jobanputra P, Parry D, Fry-Smith A, Burls A. Effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte transplantation for hyaline cartilage defects in knees: A rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1-57.
26. King PJ, Bryant T, Minas T. Autologous chondrocyte implantations for chondral defects of the knee: Indications and technique. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:177-184.
27. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee: A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:455-464.
28. Lindahl A, Brittberg M, Peterson L. Health economics benefits following autologous chondrocyte transplantation for patients with focal chondral lesions of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:358-363.
29. Micheli LJ, Browne JE, Erggelet C, et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: Multicenter experience and minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11:223-228.
30. Minas T. Chondrocyte implantation in the repair of chondral lesions of the knee: Economics and quality of life. Am J Orthop. 1998;11:739-744.
31. Minas T. Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee. Clin Orthop. 2001;391(Suppl):S349-S361.
32. Netten A, Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care 2003. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2003: 131.
33. Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent DH. SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1970.
34. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA. A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop. 1989;246:238-249.
35. Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I, Akerlund EL, Lindahl A. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:2-12.
36. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Lindahl A. Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 2):17-24.
37. Pirdie AH. The method of resurfacing osteoarthritic knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1959;41:618-623.
38. Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;59:974.
39. Sledge SL. Microfracture techniques in the treatment of osteochondral injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2001;20:365-377.
40. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2001.
41. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK. Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: Surgical technique, rehabilitation and outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:170-176.
42. Tippet JW. Articular cartilage drilling and osteotomy in osteoarthritis of the knee. In: McGinty JB, ed. Operative arthroscopy. New York: Raven Press; 1991:325-339.
43. Towse A, Pritchard C, Devlin N, eds. Cost-effectiveness thresholds: Economic and ethical issues. London: Kings Fund and Office of Health Economics (UK); 2002.
44. World Health Organisation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Paris: World Health Organisation; 1993.