Internal luminal pressure during early chick embryonic brain growth: Descriptive and empirical observations

Anatomical Record - Part A Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 285, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 737-747

  Desmond, Mary E ^a   Levitan, Michael L ^a   Haas, Andrew R ^a,b  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; CNS development; CSF cell proliferation; Hydrocephaly; Mitosis; Neural tube; Neural tube defects; Neuroepithelium; Neurogenesis

Indexed keywords

COLCHICINE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID EXAMINATION; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EMBRYO; GRAVITY; INTESTINE PRESSURE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS INDEX; MITOSIS INHIBITION; NEUROEPITHELIUM; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CHICK EMBRYO; COLCHICINE; CULTURE TECHNIQUES; MESENCEPHALON; MITOTIC INDEX; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NEUROEPITHELIAL CELLS; PRESSURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 23244448300     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20211     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abercrombie M. 1970. Contact inhibition in tissue culture. In Vitro 6:128-142.
2. Alonso MI, Gato A, Moro JA, Barbosa E. 1998. Disruption of proteoglycans in neural tube fluid by β-D-xyloside alters brain enlargement in chick embryos. Anat Rec 252:499-508.
3. Bhattacharya J, Gropper MA, Staub NC. 1984. Interstitial fluid pressure gradient measured by micropuncture in excised dog lung. Am Physiol Soc 84:271-277.
4. Coulombre AJ. 1956. The role of intraocular pressure in the development of the chick eye: I, control of eye size. J Exp Zool 133:211-225.
5. Coulombre AJ, Coulombre JL. 1958. The role of mechanical factors in the brain morphogenesis. Anat Rec 130:289-290.
6. Cowan WM, Martin AH, Wenger E. 1968. Mitotic patterns in the optic tectum of the chick during normal development and after early removal of the optic vesicle. J Exp Zool 169:71-92.
7. Desmond ME. 1982. Description of the occlusion of the lumen of the spinal cord in early human embryos. Anat Rec 204:89-93.
8. Desmond ME. 1985. Reduced number of brain cells in so-called neural overgrowth. Anat Rec 212:195-198.
9. Desmond ME, Duzy MJ, Federici BD. 1993. Second messenger regulation of occlusion of the spinal neurocoel in the chick embyro. Dev Dyn 197:291-306.
10. Desmond ME, Field MC. 1992. Evaluation of neural groove closure and subsequent initiation of spinal cord occlusion in the chick embryo. J Comp Neurol 319:246-260.
11. Desmond ME, Haas PA. 2000. Experimental manipulation and morphometric analysis of neural tube development. In: Tuan RS, Lo CW, editors. Methods in molecular biology, developmental biology protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
12. Desmond ME, Jacobson AG. 1977. Embryonic brain enlargement requires cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Dev Biol 57:188-198.
13. Desmond ME, Levitan ML. 2002. Brain expansion in the chick embryo initiated by experimentally produced occlusion of the spinal neurocoel. Anat Rec 268:147-159.
14. Desmond ME, Schoenwolf GC. 1986. Evaluation of the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in occlusion of the spinal neurocoel during rapid brain enlargement in the chick embryo. J Embryol Exp Morph 97:25-46.
15. Fein H. 1972. Microdimensional pressure measurements in electrolytes. J Appl Physiol 32:560-564.
16. Fox JR, Wiederhielm CA. 1973. Charactistics of the servo-controlled micropipet pressure system. Microvasc Res 5:324-335.
17. Fujita S. 1962. Kinetics of cellular proliferation. Exp Cell Res 28:52-60.
18. Fujita S. 1963. The matrix cell and cytogenesis in the developing central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 120:37-42.
19. Fujita S. 1964. Analysis of neuron differentiation in the central nervous system by triated thymidine autoradiography. J Comp Neurol 122:311-327.
20. Gardner WJ. 1973. The dysraphic states from syringomyelia to anacephaly. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.
21. Gato A, Martin P, Alonso MI, Martin C, Pulgar MA, Moro JA. 2004. Analysis of cerebro-spinal fluid protein composition in early developmental stages in chick embryos. J Exp Zool 301:280-289.
22. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1951. A series of normal stages of the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49-92.
23. Hove JR, Koster RW, Forouhar AS, Acevedo-Bolton G, Fraser SE, Gharib M. 2003. Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis. Nature 421:172-177.
24. Inagaki T, Schoenwolf GC, Walker ML. 1997. Change in the posterior fossa with surgically induced spina-bifida aperta in mouse. Pediatr Neurosurg 26:185-189.
25. Jelinek R, Pexieder T. 1968. The pressure of encephalic fluid in chick embryos between the 2nd and 6th day of incubation. Physiol Bohemoslov 17:297-305.
26. Jelinek R, Pexieder T. 1970. Pressure of the CSF and the morphogenesis of the CNS: I, chick embryo. Folia Morphol 18:102-110.
27. Kallen B. 1961. Studies on cell proliferation in the brain of chick embryos with special reference to the mesencephalon. Zeit Anat Entwick 122:388-401.
28. Kallen B, Valmin K. 1963. DNA synthesis in the embryonic chick central nervous system. Z Zellforsch 60:491-496.
29. Kelly S, Macklem P. 1991. Direct measurement of intracellular pressure. Am J Physiol 260:C652-C657.
30. Lai-Fook SJ. 1982. Perivascular interstitial fluid pressure measured by micropipettes in isolated dog lung. Am Physiol Soc 82:9-15.
31. + ATPase pumps in the heart of the chick embryo influences brain expansion. Soc Neurosci 17:2116.
32. Pacheco MA, Marks RW, Schoenwolf GC, Desmond ME. 1986. Quantification of the initial phases of rapid brain enlargement in the chick embryo. Am J Anat 175:403-411.
33. Pexieder T, Jelinek R. 1970. Pressure of the CSF and the morphogenesis of the CNS: II, pressure necessary for normal development of the brain vesicles. Folia Morphol 18:187-192.
34. Picken LE. 1935. A note on the mechanism of salt and water balance in the Heterotrichous cilate, Spirostomum ambiguum. J Exp Biol 13:387-392.
35. Prather JW, Bowes DN, Warrell DA, Zweifach BW. 1971. Comparison of capsule and wick techniques for measurement of interstitial fluid pressure. J Appl Physiol 6:942-945.
36. Quinn MD, Marsh DJ. 1979. Peritubular capillary control of proximal tubule reabsorption in the rat. Am J Physiol 236:F478-F487.
37. Reid S, Ferretti P. 2003. Differential expression of fibroblast growth factor receptors in the developing murine choroid plexus. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 141:15-24.
38. Sauer FC. 1935. Mitosis in the neural tube. J Comp Neurol 62:377-405.
39. Schoenwolf GC, Desmond ME. 1984a. Neural tube occlusion precedes rapid brain enlargement. J Exp Zool 30:405-407.
40. Schoenwolf GC, Desmond ME. 1984b. Descriptive studies of occlusion and reopening of the spinal canal of the early chick embryo. Anat Rec 209:251-263.
41. Schoenwolf GC, Desmond ME. 1986. Timing and positioning of re-opening of the occluded spinal neurocoel in the chick embryo. J Comp Neurol 246:459-466.
42. Weiss P. (1934) 1955. Special vertebrate organogenesis, neurogenesis. In: Willier BH, Weiss PA, Hamburger V, editors. Analysis of development. Philadelphia: Saunders. p 372.
43. Wiig H, Reed RK, Aukland K. 1981. Micropuncture measurement of interstitial fluid pressure in rat subcutis and skeletal muscle: comparison to wick-in-needle technique. Microvasc Res 21:308-319.
44. Wiig H, Reed RK. 1983. Rat brain interstitial fluid pressure measured with micropipettes. Am Physiol Soc 83:H239-H246.
45. Wilson DB. 1973. Chronological changes in the cell cycle of chick neuroepithelial cells. J Embryol 29:745-751.