|
Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 34-40
|
Unequal protection for patient rights: the divide between university and health ethics committees.
a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BEHAVIOR;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
ETHICS;
HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
HUMAN RELATION;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
NEW ZEALAND;
PERSONNEL;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
STANDARD;
STUDENT;
UNIVERSITY;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CODES OF ETHICS;
COERCION;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICS COMMITTEES;
GUIDELINES;
HEALTH PERSONNEL;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
NEW ZEALAND;
POWER (PSYCHOLOGY);
PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;
STUDENTS;
UNIVERSITIES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
EID: 23244433085
PISSN: 11767529
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/BF02448813 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (0)
|