Prevention research in mathematics: Improving outcomes, building identification models, and understanding disability

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 350-352

  Fuchs, Lynn S ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23244431562     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194050380041201     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agness, P. J., & McClone, D. G. (1987). Learning disabilities: A specific look at children with spina bifida. Insights, 8-9.
2. Ardoin, S. P., Witt, J. C., Cornell, J. E., & Koenig, J. L. (2001). Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. Barnes, M. A., Pengelly, S., Dennis, M., Wilkinson, M., Rogers, T., & Faulkner, H. (2002). Mathematics skills in good readers with hydrocephalus. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(1), 72-82.
4. Bull, R., & Johnston, R. S. (1997). Children's arithmetical difficulties: Contributions from processing speed, item identification, and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 1-24.
5. Fuchs, L. S. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement and eligibility decision making: An emphasis on treatment validity and growth [Commissioned paper]. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
6. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204-219.
7. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15.
8. Griffin, S., & Case, R. (1996). Evaluating the breadth and depth of training effects when central conceptual structures are taught. In R. Case & Y. Okamoto (Eds.), The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children's thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1-2, No. 246), 83-102.
9. Griffin, S., Case, R., & Siegler, R. S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the conceptual pre-requisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 25-50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(6), 1-7.
11. Jordan, N., Hanich, L., & Kaplan, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834-850.
12. Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L. (2003). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586-597.
13. Jordan, N., & Montani, T. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624-634.
14. Jordan, N. C., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (1995). Calculation abilities in young children with different patterns of cognitive functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 53-64.
15. Passolunghi, M. C., Cornoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 27, 779-790.
16. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23-32.
17. Speece, D. L., & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
18. Swanson, H. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471-491.
19. Van Der Heyden, A. M., & Witt, J. C. (in press). Quantifying context in assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review.
20. Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early deficits as basic cause of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.