Comparative survival analysis of urea kinetic based indices

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 566-575

  Stosovic, Milan ^a,c   Stanojevic, M ^a   Radovic, M ^a   Naumovic, R ^a   Jovanovic, D ^a   Simic, S ^a   Marinkovic, J ^b   Stankovic, S ^a   Djukanovic, L J ^a  

^a University Clinical Center   (SCG)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^c CLINICAL CENTER OF SERBIA   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Cohort study; Hemodialysis; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; HEMODIALYZERS; METABOLISM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UREA;

COHORT STUDIES; COX REGRESSION ANALYSIS; HAEMODIALYSIS; MODELING INDEX; PREDICTIVE VALUES; PROSPECTIVES; RESULTS CORRELATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL TIME; UREA KINETIC MODELING;

DIALYSIS;

UREA;

ADULT; ANURIA; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DOSE CALCULATION; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KINETICS; LONG TERM CARE; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PARAMETER; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 23144463568     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139880502800605     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. NKF-K/DOQI. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37 (suppl 1): S1-182.
2. The EBPG Expert Group on Hemodialysis. European best practice guidelines for hemodialysis (part I). Section II. Hemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17 (suppl 7): S16-31.
3. Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: An analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 4: 1205-13.
4. Movilli E. Simplified approaches to calculate Kt/V. It's time to agreement. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 24-7.
5. Ijelu-G, Corona-M, Raja-RMI. Various methods for calculation of Kt/V: A clinical comparison. ASAIO Trans 1990; 36: M364-6.
6. Charra B, Calemard E, Chazot C, et al. Dose of dialysis: What index? Blood Purif 1992; 10: 13-21.
7. Clark WR, Rocco MV, Collins AJ. Quantification of hemodialysis: Analysis of methods and the relevance to patient outcome. Blood Purif 1997; 15: 92-111.
8. Yamada T, Akiba T, Marumo F. One-compartment urea kinetic modeling is not acceptable for quantifying the adequacy of hemodialysis: Comparison of a one-compartment model with a two-compartment model. Blood Purif 1996; 14: 128-35.
9. Nathan W, Levin. Outcome comparisons by prescribable treatment options. Kidney Int 2000; 57 (suppl 74): S105-12.
10. Held PJ, Port FK, Wolfe RA, et al. The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 550-6.
11. Gotch FA. Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Fine RN, Gentile DE, eds. Clinical dialysis. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange; 1995; 156-89.
12. Depner TA. Single-compartment model. In: Depner TA, ed. Prescribing hemodialysis, a guide to urea modeling. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991; 65-89.
13. Urea kinetic modeling calculators (http://www.hdcn.com/hd/ukmcalc.htm).
14. Depner TA. Refinements and application of urea modeling. In: Depner TA, ed. Prescribing hemodialysis, a guide to urea modeling. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991; 167-94.
15. Lowrie EG, Teehan BP. Principles of prescribing dialysis therapy: Implementations recommendations from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int 1983; 23 (suppl 13): S113-22.
16. Miskulin DC, Athienites NV, Yan G, et al. Comorbidity assessment using the Index of Coexistent Diseases in a multicenter clinical trial. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 1498-510.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307-10.
18. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997; 455-60.
19. Sargent JA. Control of dialysis by single-pool urea model: The National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int 1983; 23 (suppl 13): S19-25.
20. Laird NM, Berkey CS, Lowrie EG. Modeling success or failure of dialysis therapy: The National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int 1983; 23 (suppl 13): S101-6.
21. Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 1985; 28: 526-34.
22. Depner T, Beck G, Daugirdas J, Kusek J, Eknoyan G. Lessons from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) Study: An improved measure of the actual hemodialysis dose. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33: 142-9.
23. Kovacic V, Roguljic L, Jukic I, Kovacic V. Comparison of methods for hemodialysis dose calculation. Dial Transplant 2003; 32: 170-8.
24. Teruel JL, Fernandez Lucas M, Lopez Sanchez J, et al. Relationship between the 1993 Daugirdas Kt/V method and other methods to calculate the dialysis dose. Nefrologia 2000; 20: 72-8.