Reliable change assessment in sport concussion research: A comment on the proposal and reviews of Collie et al

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 483-487

  Maassen, G H ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCUSSION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SPORT INJURY; SPORTS MEDICINE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN CONCUSSION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; SPORTS MEDICINE;

EID: 23144462026     PISSN: 03063674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.015594     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Collie A, Maruff P, McStephen M, et al. Are Reliable Change (RC) calculations appropriate for determining the extent of cognitive change in concussed athletes? Br J Sports Med 2003;37:370-2.
2. Hinton-Bayre AD, Geffen GM, Geffen LB, et al. Concussion in contact sports: Reliable Change indices of impairment and recovery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999;21:70-86.
3. Iverson GL, Lovell MR, Collins MW. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. Clin Neuropsychol 2003;17:460-7.
4. Collie A, Maruff P, Makdissi M, et al. Statistical procedures for determining the extent of cognitive change following concussion. Br J Sports Med 2004;38:273-8.
5. Collie A, Darby DG, Falletti MG, et al. Determining the extent of cognitive change after corony surgery: a review of statistical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:2005-11.
6. McNemar Q. Psychological statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1962.
7. Maassen GH. Kelley's formula as a basis for the asessment of reliable change. Psychometrika 2000;65:187-97.
8. Maassen GH. Principles of defining Reliable Change Indices. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2000;22:622-32.
9. Jacobson NS, Follette WC, Revenstorf D. Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav Ther 1984;15:336-52.
10. Jacobson NS, Revenstorf D. Statistics for assessing the clinical significance of psychotherapy techniques: issues, problems, and new developments, Behav Assess 1988;10:133-45.
11. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;51:12-19.
12. Maassen GH. The standard error in the Jacobson and Truax Reliable Change Index (the classical approach to the assessment of reliable change). J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:888-93.
13. Christensen L, Mendoza JL. A method of assessing change in a single subject: an alteration of the RC index. Behav Ther 1986;12:305-8.
14. Temkin NR, Heaton RK, Grant I, et al. Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: a comparison of four models. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999;5:357-69.
15. Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Grant I, et al. Test-retest reliability and practice effects of expanded Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999;5:346-56.
16. Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Lüders H, et al. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology 1993;7:41-52.
17. McSweeny AJ, Naugle RI, Chelune GJ, et al. "T Scores for change": an illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology. Clin Neuropsychol 1993;7:300-12.
18. Hinton-Bayre AD, Geffen GM, McFarland K. Mild head injury and speed of information processing: a prospective study of professional rugby league players. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997;19:275-89.
19. Zegers FE, Hafkenscheid AJPM. The ultimate Reliable Change Index; an alternative to the Hageman & Arrindell approach. Heymans Bulletin HB-94-1154-EX. Groningen: Universiteit van Groningen, 1994.
20. Hafkenscheid AJPM. De onverbeterlijke neiging tot 'verbetering' van veranderingsscores: terug naar de oorspronkelijke index voor betrouwbare verandering. [The incorrigible tendency to correct change scores: back to the original index for reliable change], Gedragstherapie 2002;35:317-27.
21. Bruggemans E, Van de Vijver FJR, Huysmans HA. Assessment of cognitive deterioration in individual patients following cardiac surgery: correcting for measurement error and practice effects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997;19:543-59.