Counter-expertise and the politics of collaboration

Science as Culture

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 145-172

  Fortun, Kim ^a   Cherkasky, Todd ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23144458738     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505439809526499     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adorno, T., 1991. “‘The essay as form’”. In Notes to Literature, Vol. 1, New York:Columbia University Press.
2. Bateson, G., 1958. Naven, Stanford:Stanford University Press.
3. Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind, New York:Ballantine Books.
4. Downey, G., Dumit, J., and Traweek, S., eds. Cyborgs and Citadels:Anthropological Interventions on the Borderlands of Technoscience, Seattle:University of Washington Press. (forthcoming)
5. Escobar, A., 1994. ‘Welcome to Cyberia:Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture’. Current Anthropology, 35(3):211–231.
6. Friedland, R., and Alford, R.R., 1991. “‘Bringing society back in:symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions’”. In The New Institutionalism In Organizational Analysis, Edited by:Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. J., 232–263. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
7. Haraway, D., 1997. “‘Fetus:The Virtual Speculum in the New World Order’”. In Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™, 173–212. New York:Routledge.
8. Haraway, D., 1991. “‘Situated knowledges:The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’”. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women:The Reinvention of Nature, 183–202. New York:Routledge.
9. Marcus, G.E., and Fischer, M.M.J., 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
10. Marcus, G.E., 1995. ‘Ethnography in/of the world system—the emergence of multi-sited ethnography’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24:95–117.
11. Merry, S.E., 1992. ‘Anthropology, law, and transnational processes’. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21:357–379.
12. Merton, R.K., 1973. “‘The normative structure of science’”. In The Sociology Of Science:Theoretical And Empirical Investigations, Edited by:Storer, N.W., Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
13. Lopate, P., 1995. The Art Of The Personal Essay:An Anthology From The Classical Era To The Present, New York:Anchor Books.
14. Powell, W.W., and DiMaggio, P.J., eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism In Organizational Analysis, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
15. Sluzki, C., and Ransom, D., eds. 1976. Double Bind:The Foundation Of The Communicational Approach To The Family, New York:Grune and Stratton.
16. Spivak, G., 1987. “‘Feminism and critical theory’”. In In Other Worlds:Essays In Cultural Politics, New York:Methuen.
17. Traweek, S., 1988. Beamtimes And Lifetimes:The World Of High Energy Physicists, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
18. Weakland, J., 1976. “‘The “double bind” hypothesis of schizophrenia and three-party interaction’”. In Double Bind:The Foundation Of The Communicational Approach To The Family, Edited by:Sluzki, C., and Ransom, D., 23–38. New York:Grune and Stratton.
19. West, C., 1990. “‘The new cultural politics of difference’”. In Out There:Marginalization And Contemporary Cultures, Edited by:Ferguson, R., Gever, M., and Minh-ha, T.T., 19–32. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
20. Wilden, A., and Wilson, T., 1976. “‘The double bind:Logic, magic, and economics’”. In Double Bind:The Foundation Of The Communicational Approach To The Family, Edited by:Sluzki, C., and Ranson, D., 263–286. New York:Grune and Stratton.
21. Wynne, L., 1976. “‘On the anguish, and creative passions, of not escaping double binds:a reformulation’”. In Double Bind:The Foundation Of The Communicational Approach To The Family, Edited by:Sluzki, C., and Ransom, D., New York:Grune and Stratton.