Evaluation and validation of two approaches to user profiling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3209, Issue , 2004, Pages 130-147

  Esposito, F ^a   Semeraro, G ^a   Ferilli, S ^a   Degemmis, M ^a   Di Mauro, N ^a   Basile, T M A ^a   Lops, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA MINING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB; INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP);

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; CLASSIFICATION TIME; INFORMATION OVERLOADS; LEARNING PROFILES; LEARNING USER PROFILES; MACHINE LEARNING METHODS; PROBABILISTIC METHODS; SUPERVISED METHODS;

INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP); SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 23144455692     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30123-3_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. R. Burke. Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4):331-370, 2002.
2. M. Degemmis, P. Lops, G. Semeraro, and F. Abbattista. Extraction of user profiles by discovering preferences through machine learning. In M. A. Klopotek, S. T. Wierzhon, and K. Trojanowski, editors, Information Systems: New Trends in Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining, Advances in Soft Computing, pages 69-78. Springer, 2003.
3. F. Esposito, G. Semeraro, N. Fanizzi, and S. Ferilli. Multistrategy Theory Revision: Induction and abduction in INTHELEX. Machine Learning, 38(1/2):133-156, 2000.
4. D.D. Lewis. Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In Claire Nédellec and Céline Rouveirol, editors, Proceedings of ECML- 98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, number 1398, pages 4-15, Chemnitz, DE, 1998. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, DE.
5. D.D. Lewis and M. Ringuette. A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization. In Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pages 81-93, Las Vegas, US, 1994.
6. D. Mladenic. Text-learning and related intelligent agents: a survey. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(4):44-54, 1999.
7. R.J. Mooney and L. Roy. Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 195-204, San Antonio, US, 2000. ACM Press, New York, US.
8. I. Moulinier and J.G. Ganascia. Confronting an existing machine learning algorithm to the text categorization task. In IJCAI, Workshop on New approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing, Montréal, 1995.
9. M. Orkin and R. Drogin. Vital Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990.
10. M. Pazzani and D. Billsus. Learning and revising user profiles: The identification of interesting web sites. Machine Learning, 27(3):313-331, 1997.
11. G. Salton and M.J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.
12. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Recommender systems for large-scale e-commerce: Scalable neighborhood formation using clustering. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. East West University, Bangladesh, 2002.
13. F. Sebastiani. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1):1-47, 2002.
14. G. Semeraro, F. Esposito, D. Malerba, N. Fanizzi, and S. Ferilli. A logic framework for the incremental inductive synthesis of datalog theories. In N. E. Fuchs, editor, Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation, number 1463 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 300-321. Springer-Verlag, 1998.