Effect of molecular weight hydrolyzed gelatin on its binding properties in tablets: A technical note

AAPS PharmSciTech

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Kokil, Suruchi N ^a   Patil, Pradeep R ^a   Mahadik, Kakasaheb R ^a   Paradkar, Anant R ^a  

^a BHARATI VIDYAPEETH DEEMED UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; GELATIN; PARACETAMOL; EXCIPIENT;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG GRANULATION; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PARTICLE SIZE; TABLET COMPRESSION; TABLET DISINTEGRATION TIME; TABLET FRIABILITY; VISCOSITY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; TABLET;

ACETAMINOPHEN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EXCIPIENTS; GELATIN; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PROTEIN BINDING; TABLETS;

EID: 23144446010     PISSN: 15309932     EISSN: 15309932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/pt050341     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Armstrong NA. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2002:2713-2732.
2. Henning GK. Binder. In: Swarbrick J, Boylan JC, eds. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc. 1988;1:451-464.
3. Banker GS, Neil RA. Tablets. In: Liberman HA, Lachman L, Kanig JL, eds. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1987:293-346.
4. Obiorah BA, Shotton E. The effects of waxes, hydrolyzed gelatin and moisture on the compression characteristics of paracetamol and phenacetin. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976;28:629-632.
5. Reading SJ, Spring MS. The effects of binder film characteristics on granule and tablet properties. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1984;36:421-426.
6. Marriott C. Rheology and flow of fluids. In: Aulton ME, ed. The Science of Dosage Form Design. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1988:17-37.
7. Controller of Publications. Indian Pharmacopoeia II. Delhi, India: The Controller of Publications; 1996.
8. McKenna A, McCafferty DF. Effect of particle size on the compaction mechanism and tensile strength of tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1982;34:347-351.
9. Deodhar UP, Paradkar AR, Purohit AP. Preliminary evaluation of Leucaena leucocephala seed gum as a tablet binder. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1998;24:577-582.
10. Rubinstein MH, Musihabhumma PA. Universal friability test of tablet granules. Pharm Acta Helv. 1978;53:125-129.
11. Jarosz PJ, Parrott EL. Comparison of granule strength and tablet tensile strength. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72:530-537.
12. Yeli Z, Yuet L, Chakrabarti S. Physical properties and compact analysis of commonly used direct compression binders. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003;4:E62.
13. Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationship in powder compaction. Trans Met Soc AIME. 1961a;221:671-675.
14. Esezobo S, Pilpel N. Some formulation factors affecting the tensile strength, disintegration and dissolution of uncoated oxytetracycline tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976;28:8-16.
15. Leuenberger H. The compressibility and compactability of powder systems. Int J Pharm. 1982;12:41-45.
16. Krycer I, Pope DG, Hersey JA. An evaluation of tablet binding agents: Part-I solution binders. Powder Technol. 1983;34:39-51.
17. York P, Pilpel N. The effect of temperature on the frictional, cohesive and electrical conducting properties of powders. Mat Sci Eng. 1972;9:281-319.
18. Kurup TRR, Pilpel N. The mechanical and failure properties of griseofulvin granule formulations. Powder Technol. 1976; 14:115-123.
19. Parrott EL. Compression. In: Liberman HA, Lachman L, Schwartz JB, eds. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets. Vol 2. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1990: 201-241.