The occupation of household financial management among lesbian couples

Journal of Occupational Science

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 57-68

  Bailey, Diana M ^a   Jackson, Jeanne M ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Creating home; Division of labor; Household financial management; Household occupation; Lesbian couples

Indexed keywords

EID: 23144440963     PISSN: 14427591     EISSN: 21581576     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2005.9686549     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aquilino, W. (1993). Effects of spouse presence during the interview on survey responses concerning marriage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 359-376.
2. Bailey, D. M., & Jackson, J. M. (2003). Qualitative data analysis: Challenges and dilemmas related to theory and method. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 57-65.
3. Bateson, C. (1989). Composing a life. New York: Plume.
4. Bennett, L., & Gates, G. (2004, January). The costofmarriage inequality to gay, lesbian and bisexual seniors: HRC Foundation Report. Washington, DC: Human Rights Campaign.
5. Berk, S., & Fenstermacher, A. (1985). The gender factor: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141-163.
7. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
8. Caldwell, M., & Peplau, L. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10, 587-600.
9. Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbookofqualitativeresearch (pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Christiansen, C., & Townsend, E. (Eds.). (2004). Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Clark, F. (1997). Reflections on the human as an occupational being: Biological need, tempo and temporality. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(3), 86-92.
13. Clark, F., Parham, D., Carlson, M., Frank, G., Jackson, J., Pierce, D., Wolfe, R., & Zemke, R. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 300-310.
14. Clunis, D. M., & Green, G. D. (1988). Lesbian couples. Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
15. Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473-490.
16. Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husband’s contribution in domestic labor. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 81-97.
17. Denmark, F., Shaw, J., & Ciali, S. (1985). The relationship among sex roles, living arrangements, and the division of household responsibilities. Sex Roles, 12, 617-625.
18. DeVault, M. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Dickie, V., & Frank, G. (1996). Artisan occupations in the global economy: A conceptual framework. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 3(2), 45-55.
20. Faderman, L. (1991). Odd girls and twilight lovers: A history of lesbian life in twentieth-century America. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. th century. Journal ofOccupational Science: Australia, 3(2), 56-64.
22. Frank, G. (1996b). The concept of adaptation as a foundation for occupational science research. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 47-55). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
23. Geerken, M., & Gove, W. (1983). At home and at work: The family's allocation of labor. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
25. Gray, J. M. (1997). Application of the phenomenological method to the concept of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4(1), 5-17.
26. Gray, J. M., Kennedy, B., & Zemke, R. (1996). Application of dynamic systems theory to occupation: An overview. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 309-401). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
27. Guigon, C. (1993). Authenticity, moral values, and psychotherapy. In C. Guigon (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 215-239). Cambridge University Press.
28. Hannam, D. (1997). More than a cup of tea: Meaning construction in an everyday occupation. Journal of Occupational Science; Australia, 4(2), 69-74.
29. Harry, J. (1984). Gay couples. New York: Praeger.
30. Hartmann, H. (1981). The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework. Signs, 6(3), 366-394.
31. Hasselkus, B. R. (2002). The meaning of everyday occupation. Philadelphia: Slack.
32. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. MacQuarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.) New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)
33. Hertz, R. (1986). More equal than others. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34. Hiller, D. (1984). Power dependence and division of family work. Sex Roles, 10, 1003-1019.
35. Hiller, D., & Philliber, W. (1986). The division of labor in contemporary marriage: Expectations, perceptions, and performance. Social Problems, 33, 191-201.
36. Human Rights Campaign Report, (2004). Census 2000: Public Use Microdata Samples and US Census Bureau Special Tabulation. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
37. Jackson, J. (1996). Living a meaningful existence in old age. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 339-361). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
38. Jackson, J. (1998a). The value of occupation as the core of treatment: Sandy’s experience. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 466-473.
39. Jackson, J. (1998b). Is there a place for role theory in occupational science? Journal of Occupational Science, 5(2), 56-65.
40. Kurdeck, L. (1993). The allocation of household labor in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual married couples. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 127-139.
41. Mandel, D., Jackson, J., Zemke, R., Nelson, L., & Clark F. (1999). Lifestyle redesign: Implementing the well elderly program. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
42. Mattingly, C., & Fleming, M. (1993). Clinical reasoning: Forms ofinquiry in a therapeutic practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
43. McWhirter, D., & Mattison, A. (1984). The male couple: How relationships develop. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44. Mederer, H. (1993). Division of labor in two-earner homes: Task accomplishment versus household management as critical variables in perceptions about family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(2), 133-145.
45. Pierce, D. (2003). Occupation by design. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
46. Primeau, L. (1992). A woman’s place: Unpaid work in the home. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 981-988.
47. Primeau, L. (1996). Work versus nonwork: The case of household work. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Eds.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pp. 5769). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
48. Primeau, L. (1998). Orchestration of work and play within families. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5, 188-195.
49. Reilly, M., & Lynch, J. (1990). Power sharing in lesbian partnerships. Journal of Homosexuality, 19(3), 1-30.
50. Singer, J. (1997). Husbands, wives, and human capital: Why the shoe won’t fit. Family Law Quarterly, 51(Spring), 119-132.
51. Townsend, E. (1997). Occupation: Potential for personal and social transformation. Journal ofOccupational Science: Australia, 4(1), 18-26.
52. Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice. In C. Christiansen & E. Townsend (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 243273). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53. Tronto, J. (1987). Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs, 12(4), 644-663.
54. th ed., pp. 139-154). Boston: Little Brown.
55. Whiteford, G. (2004). When people cannot participate: Occupational deprivation. In C. Christiansen & E. Townsend (Eds.) Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 221-242). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
56. Wilcock, A. (1993). A theory of the human need for occupation. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 1(1), 17-24.
57. Yerxa, E. (1991). Nationally Speaking - Seeking a relevant, ethical, and realistic way of knowing for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 199-204.
58. Yerxa, E. (1998). Occupation: The keystone of a curriculum for a self-defined profession. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 365-372.
59. st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 5(4), 1-17.
60. Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (Eds.). (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
61. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.