메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 152-154

Questioning the assumptions in the debate on assisted reproduction: Comment on the House of Commons report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law

Author keywords

Ethics; Family balancing; Justice; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Sex selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPENSATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FAMILY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAW; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; ORGANIZATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL ASPECT; TAX;

EID: 23144440570     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60950-9     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (2)

References (9)
  • 2
    • 21844468215 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • No country is an island: Comment on the House of Commons Report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law
    • Dahl E 2005 No country is an island: comment on the House of Commons Report Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 10-11.
    • (2005) Reproductive BioMedicine Online , vol.11 , pp. 10-11
    • Dahl, E.1
  • 3
    • 0142031013 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preconception sex selection for non-medical purposes: A representative survey from the UK
    • Dahl E, Rinsch K-D, Beutel M, Brosig B 2003 Preconception sex selection for non-medical purposes: a representative survey from the UK. Human Reproduction 18, 2238-2239.
    • (2003) Human Reproduction , vol.18 , pp. 2238-2239
    • Dahl, E.1    Rinsch, K.-D.2    Beutel, M.3    Brosig, B.4
  • 4
    • 15044349648 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Choosing children: Intergenerational justice?
    • Doyal L, McLean S 2005 Choosing children: intergenerational justice? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (suppl. 1), 119-124.
    • (2005) Reproductive BioMedicine Online , vol.10 , Issue.SUPPL. 1 , pp. 119-124
    • Doyal, L.1    McLean, S.2
  • 5
    • 23144434864 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • House of Commons Fifth report of session 2004-05. The Stationery Office, London, UK, 1
    • House of Commons 2005 Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law. Fifth report of session 2004-05. The Stationery Office, London, UK, 1.
    • (2005) Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law
  • 6
    • 0036491203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Social sex selection by preimplantation genetic diagnosis
    • Pembrey M 2002 Social sex selection by preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 4, 157-159.
    • (2002) Reproductive BioMedicine Online , vol.4 , pp. 157-159
    • Pembrey, M.1
  • 7
    • 0030281202 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection
    • Pennings G 1996 Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection. Human Reproduction 11, 2339-2343.
    • (1996) Human Reproduction , vol.11 , pp. 2339-2343
    • Pennings, G.1
  • 8
    • 1642294928 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - Response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'
    • Pennings G 2004 Sex selection, public policy and the HFEA's role in political decision making - response to Edgar Dahl's 'The presumption in favour of liberty'. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 268-269.
    • (2004) Reproductive BioMedicine Online , vol.8 , pp. 268-269
    • Pennings, G.1
  • 9
    • 0032706798 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preimplantation genetic diagnois: Considerations for use in elective human embryo sex selection
    • Sills ES, Goldschlag D, Levy DP et al. 1999 Preimplantation genetic diagnois: considerations for use in elective human embryo sex selection. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 16, 509-511.
    • (1999) Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics , vol.16 , pp. 509-511
    • Sills, E.S.1    Goldschlag, D.2    Levy, D.P.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.