The implications of the David Glass case for future clinical practice in the UK

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 90, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 822-825

  Elias Jones, Alun Cameron ^a,b   Samanta, J ^c  

^a LEICESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREATHING DISORDER; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTENSIVE CARE; LEGAL LIABILITY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PALLIATIVE THERAPY; PARENTAL CONSENT; PATIENT CARE; PEDIATRICS; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; REVIEW; TREATMENT REFUSAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISABLED PERSONS; EUROPE; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, MEDICAL; MALE; PARENTAL CONSENT; RESUSCITATION ORDERS; VALUE OF LIFE; WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;

EID: 23144434390     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.070672     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Glass v UK (Application No 01827/00) [2004] 1 FCR 553.
2. R v Bodkin Adams [1957] CLR (CCC).
3. Re F (mental patient: sterilisation)[1990] 2 AC 1 (HL).
4. Re B (A minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment)[1981] 1 WLR 1421.
5. Re C (A minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment)[1989] 2 All ER 782.
6. Re J (A minor)(Wardship: Medical Treatment)[1990] 3 All ER 930.
7. Re R (1991) 7 BMLR 147.
8. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA[1985] 3 All ER 402 per Lord Templeman at 432.
9. Re C (A minor; HIV treatment) High Court, 3/9/ 1999.
10. Re A (Conjoined twins: Medical treatment)[2001] 1FLR 1.
11. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S[1998] 3 All ER 673 (CA).
12. NHS Trust v C. The Times 8/10/2004 at 6.
13. NHS Trust v D. The Times LR 19/7/ 2000.
14. Re T (a minor)(wardship: medical treatment) [1996] 35 BMLR 63 (CA).
15. Re Z (a minor) (freedom of publication)[1996] 1 FLR 191 at 217.
16. Re Z (a minor) (freedom of publication)[1996] 1: Separate opinion of Judge Casadevall: paragraph 2.
17. Dawson v Wearmouth [1999] 1 FLR 1167.
18. RCPCH. Framework for withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in childhood. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2004.
19. R (Burke) v General Medical Council (2004) Lloyds L R: Medical 451 (QBD).
20. Hagger LE. The Human Rights Act 1998 and medical treatment; time for re-examination. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:460-3.
21. The Brothel Boy and other parables of the law 1998:45.