Learning preferences towards computerised competitive modes

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 341-350

  Yu, F Y ^a   Chang, L J ^b   Liu, Y H ^b   Chan, T W ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Anonymity; Competition; Games; Networks; Questionairre; School; Secondary

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044534837     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00245.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alessi, S.M. & Trollip, S.R. (2001) Multimedia for learning. Methods and Development. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
2. Butler, R. & Kedar, A. (1990) Effects of intergroup competition and school philosophy on student perceptions, group processes, and performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 4, 301-318.
3. Chang, L.J., Yang, J.C., Wang, C.T., Yu, F.Y. & Chan, T.W. (2001) The Design of Multiple Competitive Activities in a Synchronous Question-Answering Game System with Educational Agents. In Proceeding of Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future. (eds. J.D. Moor, C.L. Redfield & W.L. Johnson) pp. 539-541. IOS Press, Washington, DC.
4. Deci, E.L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L. & Porac, J. (1981) When trying to win: competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79-83.
5. Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction. HarperCollins, New York.
6. Dunn, R.E. & Goldman, M. (1966) Competition and non-competition in relationship to satisfaction and feelings toward own-group and nongroup members. Journal of Social Psychology, 68, 299-311.
7. Festinger, L. (1950) Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
8. Freitag, E.T. & Sullivan, H.J. (1995) Matching learner preference to amount of instruction: an alternative form of learner control. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 2, 5-14.
9. Gagne, R.M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
10. Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J. & Wager, W.W. (1992) Principles of Instructional Design. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth, Texas.
11. Garibaldi, A.M. (1976) Cooperation, competition and locus of control in afro-American students. Unpublished doctoral Thesis. The University of Minnesota.
12. Hammond, L.K. & Goldman, M. (1961) Competition and non-competition and its relationship to individual and group productivity. Sociometry, 24, 46-60.
13. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. & Smaldino, S.E. (2002) Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. Prentice Hall Merrill Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Maruyama, G. (1983) Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: a theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research. Review of Educational Research, 53, 5-54.
15. Lee, L.T. (1996) One-line anonymity: a new privacy battle in Cyberspace. New Jersey Journal of Communication, 4, 2, 127-146.
16. Lockard, J., Abrams, P.D. & Many, W.A. (1997) Microcomputers for Twenty-First Century Educators. Longman, New York.
17. Malone, T.W. (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333-369.
18. Malone, T.W. & Lepper, M.R. (1987) Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, Vol. 3. Cognitive and Affective Process Analyses, (eds. R.E. Snow & M.J. Farr). pp. 223-235. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Pepitone, E.A. (1980) Children in Cooperation and Competition. LexingtonBooks, Lexington, MA.
20. Sweeters, W. (1994) Multimedia electronic tools for learning. Educational Technology, 34, 5, 47-52.
21. Weigel, R.H., Wiser, P.L. & Cook, S.W. (1975) The impact of cooperative learning experiences on cross-ethnic relations and attitude. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1, 219-244.
22. Williams, E. (1977) Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 5, 963-976.