UML aspect specification using role models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2425, Issue , 2002, Pages 186-191

  Georg, Geri ^a   France, Robert ^b  

^a AGILENT LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b Department of Computer Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

ASPECT MODEL; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; MODEL ELEMENTS; NEW APPLICATIONS; PROBLEM DOMAIN; SPECIFICATION TECHNIQUE; SYSTEM MODELS; TEMPLATE-BASED;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 23044534744     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46102-7_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Andrade, L. F. and J. L. Fiadeiro. 2001. Coordination technologies for managing information system evolution. Proceedings CAISE’01. LNCS, Springer-Verlag.
2. Bergenti, F. and A. Poggi. Promoting reuse in aspect-oriented languages by means of aspect views.
3. Bergmans, L. and M. Aksit. 2001. Composing crosscutting concerns using composition filters. Communications of the ACM 44(10, October):51-57.
4. Clarke, S. and R. J. Walker. 2001. Composition patterns: an approach to designing reusable aspects.
5. Fiadeiro, J. L. Co-ordination based development and evolution.
6. France, R. B., D. K. Kim, and E. Song. 2002. Patterns as precise characterizatons of designs. Technical Report 02-101, Computer Science Department, Colorado State University.
7. France, R., D. K. Kim, E. Song, and S. Ghosh. 2001. Using roles to characterize model families. Proceedings of the Tenth OOPSLA Workshop on Behavioral Semantics: Back to the Basics.
8. France, R. and G. Georg. 2002. Modeling fault tolerant concerns using aspects. submitted to ISSRE 2002.
9. Gray, J., T. Bapty, S. Neema, and J. Tuck. 2001. handling crosscutting constraints in domain-specific modeling. Communications of the ACM 44(10,October):87-93.
10. Jurjens, J. 2001. Towards development of secure systems using UMLsec. 4th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE 2001):187-200.
11. Kiczales, G., E. Hilsdale, J. Hugunin, M. Kersten, J. Palm, and W. G. Griswold. 2001. Getting started with AspectJ. Communications of the ACM 44(10,October):59-65.
12. Lieberherr, K., D. Orleans, and J. Ovlinger. 2001. Aspect-oriented programming with adaptive methods. Communications of the ACM 44(10,October):39-41.
13. Netinant, P., T. Elrad, and M. E. Fayad. 2001. A layered apporach to building open aspect-oriented systems. Communications of the ACM 44(10, October):83-85.
14. Object Management Group. 2001. Unified Modeling Language V. 1.4. http://www.omg.org, September.
15. Ossher, H. and p. Tarr. 2001. Using multidimensional separation of concerns to (re)shape evolving software. Communications of the ACM 44(10, October):43-50.
16. Pace, J. A. D. and M. R. Campo. 2001. Analyzing the role of aspects in software design. Communications of the ACM 44(10, October).
17. Silva, A. R. Separation and composition of overlapping and interacting concerns.
18. Silva, A. R. 1999. Separation and composition of overlapping and interacting concerns. In OOPSLA’99, Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns in Object-Oriented Systems. http://www.esw.inesc.pt/dasco/.
19. Sullivan, G. T. 2001. Aspect-oriented programming using reflection and metaobject protocols. Communications of the ACM 44(10, October):95-97.
20. Suzuki, J. and Y. Yamamoto. 1999. Extending UML with aspects: Aspect support in the design phase. Proceedings of the third ECOOP Aspect-Oriented Programming Workshop.
21. Warmer, J. and A. Kleppe. 1999. The Object Constraint Language, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.