Risks of endocrine-disrupting compounds to wildlife: Extrapolating from effects on individuals to population response

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 1027-1042

  Gleason, Timothy R ^a   Nacci, Diane E ^a  

^a National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Endocrine disrupting compound; European kingfisher; Fathead minnow; Least tern; Life history strategy; Population model

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044531580     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. REFERENCES Ankley GT and Giesy JP. 1998. Endocrine disruptors in wildlife: A weight-of-evidence perspective. In: Kendall RJ, Dickerson RL, Giesy JP, et al. (eds.), Principles and Processes for Evaluating Endocrine Disruption in Wildlife, pp 349-67. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, USA
2. Bartell SM, Campbell KR, Lovelock CM, et al. 2000. Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study III. ecological process models. Env Tox Chem 19(5):1441-53
3. Benton TG and Grant A. 1999. Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology. Trends in Ecol and Evol 14(12):4G7-72
4. Brook BW, O'Grady JJ, Chapman AP, et al. 2000. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404:385-7
5. Bunzel M and Druke J. 1989. Kingfisher. In: Newton I (ed.), Lifetime Reproduction in Birds, pp 107-16. Academic Press, London, UK
6. Caswell H. 1989. Matrix Population Models. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA Caswell H. 1996. Demography meets ecotoxicology: untangling the population level effects of toxic substances. In: Newman MC and Jagoe CH (eds.), Ecotoxicology: A Hierarchical Approach, pp 255-289. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA
7. Colburn T, Dumanoski D, and Meyers JP. 1996. Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story. Dutton Books, NY, USA
8. Crisp TM, Clegg ED, Cooper RL, et al. 1998. Environmental endocrine disruption: An effects assessment and analysis. Environ Health Pers 106(suppl l):11-56
9. Grouse DT, Crowder LB, and Caswell H. 1987. A stage-based population model for logger-head sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412-23
10. De Kroon H, Plaisier A, von Groenendael J, et al. 1986. Elasticity: The relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67:1427-31
11. De Kroon H, von Groenendael J, and Ehrlen J. 2000. Elasticities: A review of methods and model limitations. Ecology 81(3):607-18
12. Doak D, Kareiva P, and Klepetka B. 1994. Modeling population viability for the desert tortoise in the western Mojave desert. Ecol Appl 4(3):446-60
13. Duda SW. 1989. Controlled spanning of laboratory reared fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and effect of different diets on survival and growth of the fry. M.S. Thesis, State University of New York, Brockport, NY, USA
14. Person S. 1991. RAMAS/stage - Generalized stage-based modeling for population dynamics. Exeter Software, Sekauket, NY, USA
15. Fogarty MJ, Rosenberg AA, and Sissenwine MP. 1992. Fisheries risk assessment sources of uncertainty: A case study of Georges Bank haddock. Environ Sci Tech 26:440-7
16. Ginzburg LR, Slobodkin LB, Johnson K, el al. 1982. Quasi extinction probabilities as a measure of impact on population growth. Risk Anal 2:171-81
17. Gleason TR, Nacci D, and Munns WR Jr. 2000. Ecological interpretation of short-term bioassay results: Development of a population model for Arbacia J Aquat Ecosys Stress and Recov 7:177-85