State drug control spending and illicit drug participation

Contemporary Economic Policy

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 150-161

  Saffer, Henry ^a,b   Chaloupka, Frank J ^c,d   Dave, Dhaval ^e  

^a NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^b KEAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^d NBER ^*

^e CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044528457     PISSN: 10743529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2001.tb00057.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bretteville-Jensen, A., and M. Sutton. "Under the Influence of the Market: An Applied Study of Illicitly Selling and Consuming Heroin." Discussion paper, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1996.
2. Caulkins, J. P., et al. Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 1997.
3. Chaloupka, F. J., M. Grossman, and J. A. Tauras. "The Demand for Cocaine and Marijuana by Youth," in Economic Analysis of Substance Use and Abuse, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
4. Davidson, R., and J. G. MacKinnon. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
5. Grossman, M., and F. Chaloupka. "The Demand for Cocaine by Young Adults: A Rational Addiction Approach." Journal of Health Economics, 17(4), 1998, 427-74.
6. Lee, L. W. "Would Harassing Drug Users Work?," Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 1993, 939-59.
7. Lynam, D. R., R. Milich, R. Zimmerman, S. P. Novak, T. K. Logan, C. Martin, C. Leukefeld, and R. Clayton. "Project DARE: No Effects at 10-Year Follow-Up." Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 1999, 590-93.
8. Office of National Drug Control Policy. State and Local Spending on Drug Control Activities: Report from the National Survey of State & Local Governments. Washington, D.C.: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1993.
9. _. National Drug Control Strategy Budget Summary. Washingtion, D.C.: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1995.
10. _. Reducing Drug Abuse in America. Washington D.C.: Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999.
11. Reuter, P. "Quantity Illusions and Paradoxes of Drug Intervention: Federal Intervention into Vice Policy." Law and Contemporary Problems, 51(1), 1988, 233-52.
12. Rice, D. P., et al. The Economic Cost of Drug Abuse and Mental Illness. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, 1990.
13. Rydell, C. P., and S. S. Everingham. Controlling Cocaine. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Drug Policy Research Center, 1994.
14. Saffer, H., and F. J. Chaloupka. "The Demand for Illicit Drugs." Economic Inquiry, Forthcoming.
15. Smith, R. J., and R. W. Blundell. "An Exogeneity Test for a Simultaneous Equation Tobit Model with an Application to Labor Supply." Econometrica, 54(3), 1986, 679-85.
16. U.S. Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States 1993. Washington, D.C.: Economics and Statistics Administration, 1993.
17. van Ours, J. "The Price Elasticity of Hard Drugs: The Case of Opium in the Dutch East Indies, 1923-1938." Journal of Political Economics, 103(2), 1995, 261-79.
18. Wagstaff, A. "Economic Aspects of Illicit Drug Markets and Drug Enforcement Polices." British Journal of Addiction, 84(10), 1989, 1173-82.
19. Wren, C. "Arizona Finds Cost Savings in Treating Drug Offenders." New York Times, April 21, 1999.