Approaches to studying and communication preferences among deaf students in distance education

Higher Education

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-83

  Richardson, John T E ^a   Woodley, Alan ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Approaches to studying; Approaches to studying inventory; Deaf students; Distance education; Hearing loss; Sign language

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044527173     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bonvillian, J.D. and Folven, R.J. (1993). 'Sign language acquisition: Developmental aspects', in Marschark, M.M. and Clark, M.D. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Deafness. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 229-265.
2. Breunig, H.L. (1965). 'An analysis of a group of deaf students in colleges with the hearing', Volta Review 67, 17-27, 94.
3. Chambers, E. (1992). 'Workload and the quality of student learning', Studies in Higher Education 17, 141-151.
4. D'Ydewalle, G. and Gielen, I. (1992). 'Attention allocation with overlapping sound, image, and text', in Rayner, K. (ed.), Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 415-427.
5. Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
6. Greenwald, A.G. and Gillmore, G.M. (1997). 'No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction', Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 743-751.
7. Gregory, S., Knight, P., McCracken, W., Powers, S. and Watson, L. (eds.) (1998). Issues in Deaf Education. London: David Fulton.