The role of significant policy issues in the 2000 presidential primaries

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2001, Pages 2082-2100

  Hansen, G J ^a   Benoit, W L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044526567     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00027640121958500     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Benoit, W. L. (1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements from 1952-1996. New York: Praeger.
2. Benoit, W. L., Blaney, J. R., & Pier, P. M. (1998). Campaign 96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. Westport, CT: Praeger.
3. Berquist, G. F. (1960). The Kennedy-Humphrey debate. Today's Speech, 8, (2/3), 31.
4. Best, S. J., & Hubbard, C. (2000). The role of televised debates in the presidential nominating process. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House 2000: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 256-284). New York: Chatham House.
5. Blankenship, J., Fine, M. G., & Davis, L. K. (1983). The 1980 Republican primary debates: The transformation of actor to scene. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 25-36.
6. Davis, J. W. (1997). U.S. presidential primaries and the caucus-convention system: A sourcebook. Westport, CT: Praeger.
7. Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Dulio, D. A., Goff, D. L., & Thurber, J. A. (1999). Untangled web: Internet use during the 1998 election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32, 53-58.
9. Enslow, R. (1999). Los Angeles Times poll alert. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 29, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.latimes.com/news/timespoll/pdf/432pa1da.pdf
10. Faucheux, R. (1998). How campaigns are using the Internet: An exclusive nationwide survey. Campaigns and Elections, 19(9), 22-25.
11. Hall, M. (1997). One-to-one politics in cyberspace. Media Studies Journal, 2, 97-103.
12. Hansen, G. J. (2000, November). Internet presidential campaigning: The influences of candidate Internet sites on the 2000 election. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Seattle, WA.
13. Hellweg, S. A., & Phillips, S. L. (1981). A verbal and visual analysis of the 1980 Houston Republican primary debate. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 47, 23-38.
14. Hickman, R. H. (1984-1985). Presidential election debates: Do they matter? Election Politics, 2, 10-14.
15. Hofstetter, C. R., Donovan, M. C., Klauber, M. R., Cole, A., Hue, C. J., & Yuasa, T. (1993). Political talk radio: A stereotype reconsidered. Political Research, 47, 467-479.
16. Hollander, B. A. (1995). The new news and the 1993 presidential campaign: Perceived vs. actual political knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 786-798.
17. Hollander, B. A. (1995-1996). The influence of talk radio on political efficacy and participation. Journal of Radio Studies, 3, 23-31.
18. Hollander, B. A. (1996). Talk radio: Predictors of use and effects on attitudes about government. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 102-113.
19. Johnson, T. J., Braima, M.A.M., & Sothirajah, J. (1999). Doing the traditional media sidestep: Comparing the effects of the Internet and other nontraditional media with traditional media in the 1996 presidential campaign. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 99-123.
20. Jones, J. M. (2000). Special analysis - McCain voters: Many Independents and Democrats would support McCain but not Bush in general election. Retrieved March 9, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://205.219.140.75/poll/releases/pr000303b.asp
21. Kaid, L. L., & Ballotti, J. (1991, November). Television advertising in presidential primaries and caucuses. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
22. Kane, T. (1987). The Dewey-Stassen primary debate of 1948: An examination of format for presidential debates. In J. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
23. Kendall, K. E. (2000). Communication in the presidential primaries: Candidates and the media, 1912-2000. Westport, CT: Praeger.
24. Kern, M. (1997). Social capital and citizen interpretation of political ads, news, and web site information in the 1996 presidential election. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1238-1249.
25. Klotz, R. (1998). Virtual criticism: Negative advertising on the Internet in the 1996 Senate race. Political Communication, 15, 347-365.
26. Lanoue, D. J., & Schrott, P. R. (1989). The effects of primary season debates on public opinion. Political Behavior, 11, 289-306.
27. Lanoue, D. J., & Schrott, P. R. (1991). The joint press conference: The history, impact, and prospects of American presidential debates. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
28. Lemert, J. L., Elliot, W. R., Nestvold, K. J., & Rarick, G. R. (1983). Effects of viewing a presidential primary debate. Communication Research, 10, 155-173.
29. Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Tu Chin. (1997). Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 primary season. Press/Politics, 2, 59-78.
30. Martel, M. (1983). Political campaign debates: Issues, strategies and tactics. New York: Longman.
31. Murphy, J. M. (1972). Presidential debates and campaign rhetoric: Text within context. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 219-228.
32. Orren, G. R. (1985). The nomination process: Vicissitudes of candidate selection. In M. Nelson (Ed.), The elections of 1984 (pp. 27-82). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
33. Payne, J. G., Marlier, J., & Baukus, R. A. (1989). Polispots in the 1988 presidential primaries: Separating the nominees from the rest of the guys. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 365-381.
34. Pew Research Center. (1998). Online newcomers more middle-brow, less work-oriented: The Internet news audience goes ordinary. Retrieved September 12, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.people-press.org/tech98sum.htm
35. Pew Research Center. (2000a). Audiences fragmented and skeptical: The tough job of communicating with voters. Retrieved June 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.people-press. org/jan00que2.htm
36. Pew Research Center. (2000b). Investors now go online for quotes, advice: Internet sapping broadcast news audience. Retrieved June 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.people-press. org/media00que.htm
37. Pfau, M. (1984). A comparative assessment of intra-party political debate formats. Political Communication Review, 8, 1-23.
38. Pfau, M. (1987). The influence of intra-party debates on candidate preference. Communication Research, 14, 687-697.
39. Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debates and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 16, 99-112.
40. Pfau, M., Diedrich, T., Larson, K. M., & Winkle, K. M. van. (1993). Relational and competence perceptions of presidential candidates during primary election campaigns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 275-292.
41. Pomper, G. M. (1975). Voters' choice: Varieties of American electoral behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.
42. Ray, R. F. (1961). Thomas E. Dewey: The great Oregon debate of 1948. In R. Reid (Ed.), American public address: Studies in honor of Albert Craig Baird (pp. 245-270). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
43. Selnow, G. (1998). Electronic whistle stops: The impact of the Internet on American politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44. Shapiro, M. A., & Rieger, R. H. (1992). Comparing positive and negative political advertising on the radio. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 135-145.
45. Shyles, L. (1983). Defining the issues of a presidential election from televised political spot advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 27, 333-343.
46. Shyles, L. (1984). The relationships of images, issues, and presentational methods in televised spot advertisements for 1980's American presidential primaries. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 28, 405-421.
47. Stelzner, H. G. (1971). Humphrey and Kennedy court West Virginia, May 3, 1960. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 37, 21-33.
48. Tedesco, J. C., Miller, J. L., & Spiker, J. A. (1999). Presidential campaigning on the information superhighway: An exploration of content and form. In L. L. Raid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 51-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Vivian, J. (1999). The media of mass communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50. Whillock, R. K. (1997). Cyber-politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1208-1225.
51. Yawn, M., Ellsworth, K., Beatty, B., & Kahn, K. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior, 20, 155-181.