Operationism again: What Did Bridgman Say? What Did Bridgman Need?

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 45-51

  Green, Christopher D ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

epistemology; operationism; philosophy of science; psychology; theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044523640     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354301111003     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bridgman, P.W.(1960). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1927.)
2. Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
3. Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
4. Garner, W.R., Hake, H.W., & Erikson, C.W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychological Review, 63, 149-159.
5. Grace, R.C.(2001). On the failure of operationism. Theory and Psychology, 11, 5-33.
6. Green, C.D.(1992). Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 2, 291-320.
7. Hempel, C.G.(1952). Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Koch, S.(1992). Psychology's Bridgman vs. Bridgman's Bridgman: An essay in reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 2, 261-290.
9. Leahey, T.H.(1980). The myth of operationism. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1, 127-143.
10. Logan, G.D., Coles, M.G.H., & Kramer, A.F. (1996). Introduction. In A.F. Kramer, M.G.H. Coles, & G.D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. xv-xxv). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Russell, L.J.(1928). [Review of P.W. Bridgman's The logic of modern physics]. Mind, 37, 355-361.