Culture and context: An empirical study for the development of a framework for the elicitation of cultural influence in product usage

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 12, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 327-345

  Honold, Pia ^a  

^a SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

USER INTERFACES;

CULTURAL DIFFERENCE; CULTURAL INFLUENCES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; PRODUCT DESIGNERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUALITATIVE METHOD; QUALITATIVE STUDY; USER GROUPS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 23044522635     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1203&4_5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bannon, L., & Bødker, S. (1991). Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (pp. 227-253). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bedny, G., & Meister, D. (1997). The Russian theory of activity: Current applications to design and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Bladder, F. (1995). Activity theory, CSCW and organizations. In A. F. Monk & G. N. Gilbert (Eds.), Perspectives on HCI: Diverse approaches (pp. 223-248). London: Academic.
4. Boesch, E. E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Berlin: Springer.
5. Boesch, E. E. (1996). Das fremde und das eigene [That is theirs, this is ours]. In A. Thomas (Ed.), Psychologie interkulturellen handelns (pp. 87-105). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
6. Engeström, Y. (1996). Non scholae sed vitae discimus: Towards overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 151-170). London: Routledge.
7. Engler, G. (1997). Zur interkulturellen Kommunikation mit Indien: Eine Untersuchung über Kommunikationsprobleme zwischen Germanen und Indern in Unternehmen [Intercultural communication with India: An investigation into communication problems between Germans and Indians in companies]. Unpublished master's thesis, Faculty of Archaeology and Culture Sciences at the Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
8. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Honold, P. (in press). Interkulturelles Usability Engineering: Eine Untersuchung zu kulturellen Einflüssen auf die Gestaltung und Nutzung technischer Produkte [Intercultural usability engineering: An investigation into cultural influences on the design and use of technical products]. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDI-Verlag.
11. Kaptelinin, V. (1996a). Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 103-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Kaptelinin, V. (1996b). Computer mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental context. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 45-67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Karani Lam de Arazo, Z. (1995, Summer). Doing business in India: What your expats should know. Relocation Journal & R. E. News, pp. 10, 11, 23, 28.
14. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Mayring, P. (1993). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]. Weinheim, Germany: Deutscher Studien Verlag.
16. Muhr, T. (1997). ATLAS-ti: The knowledge workbench: Software for qualitative analysis, version 4.2. London: Sage.
17. Nardi, B. A. (1996a). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Nardi, B. A. (1996b). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Ratner, C. (1997). In defense of activity theory. Culture & Psychology, 3, 211-223.
20. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Soudijn, K. A., Hutschemaekers, G. J. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (1990). The conceptualisation of culture. In F. J. R. van de Vijver & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.), The investigation of culture: Current issues in cultural psychology (pp. 19-39). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
22. Strauss, A. L. (1994). Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung [Principles of qualitative social research]. Munich, Germany: Fink.
23. Thomas, A. (1996). Analyse der Handlungswirksamkeit von Kulrurstandards [Analysis of the effectiveness of cultural standards]. In A. Thomas (Ed.), Psychologie interkulturellen Handelns (pp. 107-135). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
24. Zingel, W. -P. (1995). Infrastruktur: Transport und Kommunikation [Infrastructure: Transport and communication]. In D. Rothermund (Ed.), Indien. Kultur, Geschichte, Politik, Wirtschaft, Umwelt: Ein Handbuch (pp. 550-571). Munich, Germany: C. H. Beck.