Liberal machines

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1548-1560

  Thomas, Julian ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044521133     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00027640021955928     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ACLU vs Reno. (1996). U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, June.
2. Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 3). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3. Commonwealth of Australia. (1998). A strategic framework for the information economy. Canberra: Author.
4. Human Rights Watch. (1998). Freedom of expression on the Internet [Online]. Available: http://www.hrw.org/hrw/worldreport99/special/internet.html
5. Kahin, B., & Nesson, C. (Eds.). (1997). Borders in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Mason, A. (1998). Public interest objectives and the law of copyright. Journal of Law and Information Science, 2.
7. Melody, W. H. (1996). Toward a framework for designing information policies. Telecommunications Policy, 20(4), 243-259.
8. Ministry for Research and Information Technology (Denmark) (1994). Info-Society 2000, Copenhagen.
9. Pool, I. de S. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Harvard: Belknap Press.
10. Rabb, C. D. (1997). Privacy, democracy, information. In B. D. Loader (Ed.), The governance of cyberspace (pp. 155-174). London: Routledge.
11. Ris, A. M. (1997). The information welfare society: An assessment of Danish government initiatives preparing for the Information Age. In B. Kahin & E. Wilson (Eds.), National information infrastructure initiatives: Vision and policy design (pp. 424-456). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Teubner, G. (Ed.). (1997). Global law without a state. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
13. United Nations. (1998a, May). Secretary-General says communications technology has great democratizing power waiting to be harnessed to global struggle for peace and development (Press Release SG/SM/6502 SAG/4). New York: Author.
14. United Nations. (1998b, December). Expert seminar supports expanded use of information and communications technologies in advocacy for reproductive health and rights (Press Release POP/693). New York: Author.
15. U.S. Government. (1994). National Information Infrastructure: Agenda for action, Washington, DC.
16. U.S. Government. (1995). Global Information Infrastructure: Agenda for co-operation, Washington, DC.
17. World Intellectual Property Organization. (1996). Document CRNR/DC/6, Basic proposal for the protection of databases, Article 2, Geneva.