Author and Reviewer Guideline Series: Reporting Qualitative Studies

Journal of Early Intervention

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 77-80

  Mcwilliam, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044520581     PISSN: 10538151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105381510002300202     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Ducharme, M.K.; Licklider, B.L., Matthes, W.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (1995). Conceptual and analysis criteria. Web site: http://www.iptv.org/FINELINK/publications/criteria.html#qual. Des Moines, IA: FINE Foundation
3. Ferguson, D.L. (1998, July). Changing criteria for defining quality and rigor in interpretivist research. Paper presented at the OSERS Project Directors Meeting, Washington, DC.
4. Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75-91.
5. Lincoln, Y. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 275-289.
6. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Manning, K. (1997). Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: Methodological considerations without prescription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 93-115.
8. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.