A graph-oriented model for articulation of ontology interdependences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1777, Issue , 2000, Pages 86-100

  Mitra, Prasenjit ^a   Wiederhold, Gio ^a   Kersten, Martin ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CWI   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Graph based model; Ontology algebra; Semantic interoperation

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; GRAPHIC METHODS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; OBJECT-ORIENTED DATABASES; SEMANTICS;

AUTOMATIC COMPOSITION; GLOBAL ONTOLOGY; GRAPH-BASED MODELING; GRAPH-ORIENTED MODEL; INTEROPERATIONS; KNOWLEDGE RULES; SEMANTIC DICTIONARIES; SEMI-AUTOMATICS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 23044519428     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46439-5_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. The context interchange project, http://context.mit.edu/coin/
2. Cyc knowledge base, http://www.cyc.com/
3. Information integration using infomaster, http://infomaster.stanford.edu/infomaster-info.html
4. The information manifold, http://portal.research.bell-labs.com/orgs/ssr/people/levy/paper-abstracts.html#iga
5. Ontolingua, http://www-ksl-svc.stanford.edu:5915/doc/project-papers.html
6. The stanford-ibm manager of multiple information sources, http://www-db.stanford.edu/tsimmis/
7. Extensible markup language (xml) 1.0 http://www.w3.org/tr/rec-xml, Feb 1999
8. Resource description framework (rdf) model and syntax specification, http://www.w3.org/tr/rec-rdf-syntax/, February 1999
9. P. Buneman, S. Davidson, and A. Kosky. Theoretical aspects of schema merging. In Proc. of EDBT '92, pages 152-167. EDBT, Springer Verlag, Mar. 1992
10. M. Gyssens, J. Paredaens, and D. Van Gucht. A graph-oriented object database model. In Proc. PODS, pages 417-424, 1990
11. J. Jannink. Resolution of Semantic Differences in Ontologies. PhD thesis, Stanford University
12. C.A. Knoblock, S. Minton, J.L. Ambite, N. Ashish, P.J. Modi, Ion Muslea, A.G. Philpot, and S. Tejada. Modeling web sources for information integration. In Proc. of the Fifteenth National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, 1998
13. A.T. McCray, A.M. Razi, A.K. Bangalore, A.C. Browne, and P.Z. Stavri. The umls knowledge source server: A versatile internet-based research tool. In Proc. AMIA Fall Symp, pages 164-168, 1996
14. P. Mitra. Algorithms for answering queries efficiently using views, http://www-db.stanford.edu/prasen9/qralgo.pdf. Technical report, Infolab, Stanford University, September 1999
15. P. Mitra, G. Wiederhold, and J. Jannink. Semi-automatic integration of knowledge sources. In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. On Information FUSION'99, 1999
16. Y. Papakonstantinou, H. Garcia-Molina, and Widom J. Object exchange across heterogeneous information sources, March 1995
17. P. Scheuermann, C. Yu, A. Elmagarmid, H. Garcia-Molina, F. Manola, D. McLeod, A. Rosenthal, and M. Templeton. Report on the workshop on heterogenous database systems. In ACM SIGMOD RECORD 19,4, pages 23-31, 1989
18. A.P. Sheth and J.A. Larson. Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogenous, and autonomous databases. In ACM Computing Surveys, pages 183236, 1994
19. M. Siegel and S. Madnick. A metadata approach to solving semantic conflicts. In Proc. of the 17th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, pages 133-145, 1991