Median and ulnar nerve injuries: A meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair: Discussion

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 495-496

  Thomson, J Grant ^a,b  

^a Section of Plastic Surgery ^*

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; MEDIAN NERVE; META ANALYSIS; MICROSURGERY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE INJURY; NOTE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SCHEDULING; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SENSORY SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULNAR NERVE;

EID: 23044516567     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172895.80179.ed     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Woodall, B., and Beebe, W. G. In Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Follow-Up Study of 3,656 World War II Injuries. VA Medical Monograph. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1956.
2. Mackinnon, S. E., and Dellon, A. L. Nerve repair and nerve grafting. In Surgery of the Peripheral Nerve. New York: Thieme, 1988. Pp. 89-129.
3. Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: Papers that summarize other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). B.M.J. 315: 672, 1997.