Maxillary advancement in cleft patients by means of transantral distraction: Development of a new type of distraction device and pilot study of its clinical application

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 591-598

  Umstadt, Horst E ^a,b  

^a Philipps University Marburg ^*

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE NECROSIS; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; DEVICE; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; HUMAN; OSTEOTOMY; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELAPSE; SPLINT; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY; PILOT PROJECTS; REOPERATION; SPLINTS;

EID: 23044515815     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000173062.80014.8c     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hirano, A., and Suzuki, H. Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 38: 1, 2001.
2. Bell, W. H. Biological basis for maxillary osteotomies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 38: 279, 1973.
3. Hochban, W., Gans, C., and Austermann, K. H. Long-term results after maxillary advancement in patients with cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 30: 237, 1993.
4. Heliövaara, A., Ranta, R., Hukki, J., and Rintala, A. Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Hand Surg. 35: 43, 2001.
5. Kerawala, C. J., Stassen, E. F., and Shaw, I. A. Influence of routine bone grafting on the stability of the non-cleft Le-Fort I osteotomy. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 39: 434, 2001.
6. Drommer, R., and Luhr, H. G. The stabilization of osteotomized maxillary segment with Luhr miniplates in secondary cleft surgery. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 9: 166, 1981.
7. Adlam, D. M., and Banks, P. A. Retrospective study of the stability of midface osteotomies in cleft lip and palate patients. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 27: 265, 1989.
8. Houston, W. J. B., James, D. R., Jones, E., and Kavvadia, S. Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies in cleft palate cases: Surgical changes and stability. J. Craniomaxulofac. Surg. 17: 9, 1989.
9. Brachvogel, P., and Schliephake, H. Indikationen zur Osteoplastik im Rahmen der Umstellungsosteotomie des Oberkiefers bei Patienten mit Lippen-Kiefer-Gaumenspalten. Fortschr. Kiefer. Gesichts. Chir. 38: 95, 1991.
10. Steinhäuser, E. W., and Giannulopulos, C. Maxillary osteotomy and simultaneous osteoplasty in patients with lip-maxillary-palatal clefts. Fortschr. Kiefer. Gesichts. Chir. 38: 98, 1991.
11. McCarthy, J. G., Schreiber, J., Karp, N., et al. Lengthening of the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 89: 1, 1992.
12. Ilizarov, G. A. The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull. Hosp. Jt. Dis. Orthop. Inst. 48: 1, 1988.
13. Rachmiel, A., Potparic, Z., Jackson, I. T., et al. Midface advancement by gradual distraction. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 46: 201, 1993.
14. Molina, F. Distraction of the midface. Presented at the Workshop on Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton, New York University Medical Center, March 18-19, 1994.
15. Cohen, S. R., Rutrick, R. E., and Burstein, F. D. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: Initial experience with new distraction system. J. Craniofac. Surg. 6: 368, 1995.
16. Block, M. S., and Brister, G. D. Use of distraction osteogenesis for maxillary advancement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 52: 282, 1994.
17. Polley, J. W., and Figueroa, A. A. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J. Craniofac. Surg. 8: 181, 1997.
18. Altuna, G., Walker, D. A., and Freeman, E. Surgically assisted-rapid orthopedic lengthening of the maxilla in primates: Relapse following distraction osteogenesis. Int. J. Adult Orthod. Orthognath. Surg. 10: 269, 1995.
19. Wong, G. B., and Padwa, B. L. Le Fort I soft tissue distraction: A hybrid technique. J. Craniofac. Surg. 13: 572, 2002.
20. Ahn, J. G., Figueroa, A. A., Braun, S., and Polley, J. W. Biomechanical considerations in distraction of the osteotomized dentomaxillary complex. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 116: 264, 1999.
21. Austermann, K. H., and Bollmann, F. Eine Methode zur Bestimmung der günstigsten Osteotomieebene bei Le Fort I Osteotomien. In K. Schuchardt and N. Schwenzer (Eds.), Fortschritte der Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Vol. 26. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1981. P. 121.
22. Bothur, S., Blomquist, J. E., and Isaksson, S. Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with advancement: A comparison of single maxillary surgery and a two-jaw procedure. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 56: 1029, 1998.
23. Weinzweig, J., Baker, S. B., Mackay, G. J., Whitaker, L. A., and Bartlett, S. P. Immediate versus delayed midface distraction in a primate model using a new intraoral internal device. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109: 1600, 2002.
24. Hierl, T., and Hemprich, A. Callus distraction of the midface in severely atrophied maxilla: A case report. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 36: 457, 1999.
25. Swennen, G., Figueroa, A. A., Schierle, H., Polley, J. W., and Malevez, C. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis: A two-dimensional mathematical model. J. Craniofac. Surg. 11: 312, 2000.
26. Baumann, A., and Sinko, K. Importance of soft tissue for skeletal stability in maxillary advancement in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 40: 65, 2003.
27. Ko, E. W., Alvaro, A. F., Guyette, T. W., Polley, J. W., and Law, W. R. Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: A 1-year cephalometric follow-up. J. Craniofac. Surg. 10: 312, 1999.
28. Yonehara, Y., Takato, T., Matsumoto, S., and Nakatsuka, T. Distraction of scarred soft tissue before secondary bone grafting. A case report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 28: 347, 1999.