Formulation in general practice consultations

Text

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 147-170

  Gafaranga, Joseph ^a   Britten, Nicky ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action formulation; Doctor patient interaction; Formulating summary; Formulation; General practice; Mutuality

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044510059     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.2004.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bilmes, J. (1988). The concept of preference in Conversation Analysis. Language in Society 17: 161-181
2. Britten, N., Stevenson, F. A., Barry, C. A., Barber, N., and Bradley, C. (2000). Misunderstandings in prescribing decisions in general practice: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal 320: 484
3. Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), 251-277. Oxford: Polity Press
4. Byrne, P. S. and Long, B. E. L. (1976). Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviour of General Practioners Consulting in their Surgeries. London: Department of Health and Social Security
5. Costello, B. A. and Roberts, F. (2001). Medical recommendations as joint practice. Health Communication 13 (3): 241-260
6. Charles, C., Gafni, A., and Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 44: 681-692
7. -(1999). Decision-making in physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine 49: 651-661
8. Drew, P. (2003). Comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different institutional settings: A sketch. In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, P. J. Glenn, C. D. Lebaron, and J. Mandelbaum (eds.), 293-308. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
9. Elwyn, G., Gwyn, R., Edwards, A., and Grol, R. (1999). Is 'shared decision-making' feasible in consulations for upper respiratory infections? Assessing the influence of antibiotic expectations using discourse analysis. Health Expectations 2: 105-117
10. Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical social action. In Theoretical Sociology, J. C. Mckinney and E. A. Teryakian (eds.), 338-66. New York: Appleton Century Crofts
11. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12. Gwyn, R. and Elwyn, G. (1999). When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounter. Social Science and Medicine 49: 437-447
13. Haakana, M. (2001). Laughter as a patient's resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text 21: 187-220
14. Hak, T. and de Boer, F. (1996). Formulations in first encounters. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 83-99
15. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Volume 3. Discourse and Dialogue, T. A. Van Dijk (ed.), 95-117. London: Academic Press
16. Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, G. Psathas (ed.), 123-162. New York: Irvington
17. Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontational Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
18. Larsen, J. H., Risor, O., and Putnam, S. (1997). P-R-A-C-T-I-C-A-L: A step-by-step model of conducting the consultation in general practice. Family Practice 14: 295-301
19. Maynard, D. W. (1991). The perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnostic news. In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), 164-192. Oxford: Polity Press
20. Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk among Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd
21. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Royal Pharmacuetical Society of Great Britain (RPSGB) (1997). From Compliance to Concordance: Achieving Shared Goals in Medicine Taking. London
23. Sacks, H. (1974). On the analysability of stories by children. In Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, R. Turner (ed.), 216-222. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
24. Schegloff, E. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds.), 44-70. Oxford: Polity Press
25. Stevenson, F. A., Britten, N., Barry, C. A., Barber, N., and Bradley, C. P. (2000a). Research notes: qualitative methods and prescribing research. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 25: 317-324
26. (2000b). Doctor-patient communication about drugs: The evidence for shared decision making. Social Science and Medicine 50: 829-840
27. Ten Have, P. (1989). The consultation as a genre. In Text and Talk as Social Practice, B. Torode (ed.), 115-133. Dordrecht: Foris Publications
28. Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman
29. Walker, E. (1994). Negotiating work. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of York