Motor imagery while judging object-hand interactions

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1193-1196

  Pelgrims, Barbara ^a   Andres, Michaël ^a   Olivier, Etienne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Corticospinal excitability; Grasping; Motor imagery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; MALE; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; JUDGMENT; MAGNETICS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PYRAMIDAL TRACTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 23044509827     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200508010-00012     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001; 14(Pt 2):S103-S109.
2. Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 1989; 34:35-42.
3. Collet C, Roure R, Dittmar A, Vernet-Maury E. The activity of the vegetative nervous system like witness of themental imagery in the sportsmen, his role in the performance and the training. Sci Sports 2000; 15:261-263.
4. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, Poline JB, Gaymard B, Marsault C et al. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10:1093-1104.
5. Johnson SH. Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition 2000; 74:33-70.
6. Buxbaum LJ, Johnson-Frey SH, Bartlett-Williams M. Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2005; 43:917-929.
7. Fadiga L, Buccino G, Craighero L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Pavesi G. Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37:147-158.
8. Pitcher JB, Robertson AL, Clover EC, Jaberzadeh S. Facilitation of cortically evoked potentials with motor imagery during post-exercise depression of corticospinal excitability. Exp Brain Res 2005; 160:409-417.
9. Isaac A, Marks D, Russell D. An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire (VMIQ). J Ment Imagery 1986; 10:23-30.
10. Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC et al. Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 1995; 375:54-58.
11. Johnson SH, Rotte M, Grafton ST, Hinrichs H, Gazzaniga MS, Heinze HJ. Selective activation of a parietofrontal circuit during implicitly imagined prehension. Neuroimage 2002; 17:1693-1704.
12. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 1994; 17:187-245.
13. Vargas CD, Olivier E, Craighero L, Fadiga L, Duhamel JR, Sirigu A. The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14:1200-1206.
14. Grézes J, Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40:212-222.
15. Richter W, Somorjai R, Summers R, Jarmasz M, Menon RS, Gati JS et al. Motor area activity during mental rotation studied by time-resolved single-trial fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12:310-320.
16. Ganis G, Keenan JP, Kosslyn SM, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex affects mental rotation. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10:175-180.
17. Johnson SH. Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegies. Neuroreport 2000; 11:729-732.
18. Johnson-Frey SH. Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain Cogn 2004; 55:328-331.