An enhanced obstetrics track for a family practice residency program: Results from the first 6 years

Journal of the American Board of Family Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 223-228

  Eidson Ton, W Suzanne ^a,b   Nuovo, Jim ^a   Solis, Blanca ^a   Ewing, Kristine ^a   Diaz, Heather ^a   Smith, Lloyd H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION PROGRAM; EXAMINATION; FAMILY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; OBSTETRICS; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY;

CURRICULUM; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; OBSTETRICS;

EID: 23044507279     PISSN: 08938652     EISSN: 15448770     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.18.3.223     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Facts about Family Practice. Kansas City (MO): American Academy of Family Physicians; 2003.
2. Delzell JE Jr, Ringdahl EN. The University of Missouri rural obstetric network: creating rural obstetric training sites for a university-based residency program. Fam Med 2003;35:243-5.
3. Helton M, Skinner B, Denniston C. A maternal and child health curriculum for family practice residents: results of an intervention at the University of North Carolina. Fam Med 2003;35:174-80.
4. Nuovo J, Smith LH. Enhanced obstetrics training for family practice residents: a unique collaborative program. J Am Board Fam Pract 1999;12:409-12.
5. Colwill JM, Cultice JM. The future supply of family physicians: implications for rural America. Health Affairs 2003;22:190-7.
6. Cohen D, Guirguis-Blake J, Jack B, et al. Family physicians make a substantial contribution to maternity care: the case of the state of Maine. Am Fam Physician 2003;68:405.