Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography for pancreas divisum: Assessment with oblique coronal reconstruction images

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 452-460

  Itoh, Shigeki ^a   Takada, Akira ^b   Satake, Hiroko ^b   Ota, Toyohiro ^b   Ishigaki, Takeo ^b  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography technology; Helical computed tomography; Pancreas divisum; Pancreatic ducts

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; DUCTS;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY TECHNOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HELICAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIES; HIGH RESOLUTION; ISOTROPICS; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PANCREAS DIVISUM; PANCREATIC DUCTS; RECONSTRUCTION IMAGE;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; MULTISLICE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBLIQUE CORONAL PLANE; ORIENTATION; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS DIVISUM; PANCREAS DUCT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 23044491837     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000164670.88519.e5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kleitsch WP. Anatomy of the pancreas, a study with special reference to the duct system. Arch Surg. 1995;71:795-803.
2. Smanio T. Proposed nomenclature and classification of the human pancreatic ducts and duodenal papillae: study based on 200 postmortems. Int Surg. 1969;52:125-134.
3. Delhaye M, Engelholm L, Cremer M. Pancreas divisum: controversial clinical significance. Dig Dis. 1988;6:30-39.
4. Buitin P, Person B, Charneau J, et al. Pancreas divisum and pancreatitis: a coincidental association? Endoscopy. 1991;23:55-58.
5. Warshaw AL, Simeone JF, Schapiro RH, et al. Evaluation and treatment of the dominant dorsal duct syndrome (pancreas divisum redefined). Am J Surg. 1990;159:59-66.
6. Satterfield ST, McCarthy JH, Geenen JE, et al. Clinical experience in 82 patients with pancreas divisum: Preliminary results of manometry and endoscopic therapy. Pancreas. 1988;3:248-253.
7. Magee DJ, Burdick JS. Anatomy, histology, embryology, and developmental anomalies of the pancreas. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH, eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Pathology/Diagnosis/Management. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002:859-869.
8. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10000 cases. Gastroenterology. 1976;70:314-320.
9. Mandura JA. Pancreas divisum: stenosis of the dorsally dominant pancreatic duct-a surgically correctable lesion. Am J Surg. 1986;51:742-745.
10. Bret PM, Reinhold C, Taourel P, et al. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1996;199:99-103.
11. Lai R, Freeman ML, Cass OW, et al. Accurate diagnosis of pancreas divisum by linear-array endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2004;36: 705-709.
12. Klein SD, Affronti JP. Pancreas divisum, an evidence-based review: part 1, pathophysiology. Castrointest Endosc. 2004;60:419-425.
13. Zeman RK, McVay LV, Silverman PM, et al. Pancreas divisum: thin-section CT. Radiology. 1988;169:395-398.
14. Soulen MC, Zerhouni EA, Fishman EK, et al. Enlargement of the pancreatic head in patients with pancreas divisum. Clin Imaging. 1989;13: 51-57.
15. Raptopoulos V, Prassopoulos P, Chuttani R, et al. Multiplanar CT pancreatography and distal cholangiography with minimum intensity projections. Radiology. 1998;207:317-324.
16. Nishiharu T, Yamashia Y, Abe Y, et al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging-ROC analysis. Radiology. 1999;212:445-452.
17. Park SJ, Han JK, Kim TK, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:281-286.
18. Wong K, Paulson EK, Nelson RC. Breath-hold three dimensional CT of the liver with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology. 2001;219: 75-79.
19. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, et al. Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:277-285.
20. Lu DSK, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, et al. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic rumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology. 1996;199:697-701.
21. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, et al. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology. 1999;210: 97-101.
22. Delhaye M, Cremer M. Clinical significance of pancreas divisum. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1992;55:306-313.
23. Bernald JP, Sahel J, Giovannini M, et al. Pancreas divisum is a probable cause of acute pancreatitis: a report of 137 cases. Pancreas. 1990;5:248-253.
24. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:728-733.
25. Takada A, Itoh S, Satake H, et al. Branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous tumor: diagnostic value of multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2005. [Epub ahead of print]
26. Nino-Murcia M, Tamm EP, Charnsangavej C, et al. Multidetector-row helical CT and advanced postprocessing techniques for the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:366-377.
27. Vargas R, Nino-Murcia M, Trueblood W, et al. MDCT in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: prediction of vascular invasion and resectability using a multiphasic technique with curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:419-425.
28. Desser TS, Sommer FG, Jeffrey RB, Jr. Value of curved planar reformations in MDCT of abdominal pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1477-1484.