Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT)

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Merwa, Robert ^a   Hollaus, Karl ^a   Brunner, Patricia ^a   Scharfetter, Hermann ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Gradiometer; Inverse problem; Magnetic induction tomography; Regularization; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

EDDY CURRENT TESTING; EDDY CURRENTS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETISM; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; TOMOGRAPHY;

CONDUCTIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; EXCITATION COILS; GRADIOMETER; INVERSE PROBLEM; MAGNETIC INDUCTION TOMOGRAPHY; PLANAR GRADIOMETERS; RECEIVER COIL; REGULARISATION; REGULARIZATION SCHEMES; SENSITIVITY;

LOCATION;

CONDUCTANCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC INDUCTION TOMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RADIATION PHYSICS; TOMOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY CONSTITUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPEDANCE; IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; MAGNETISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BODY CONSTITUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 23044490284     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 09673334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/023     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Brandstätter B, Hollaus K, Hutten H, Mayer M, Merwa R and Scharfetter H 2003 Direct estimation of Cole parameters in multifrequency EIT using a regularized Gauss-Newton method Physiol. Meas. 24 437-48
2. Casanas R, Scharfetter H, Altes A, Remacha A, Sarda P, Sierra J, Merwa R, Hollaus K and Rosell J 2004 Measurement of liver iron overload by magnetic induction using a planar gradiometer: preliminary human results Physiol. Meas. 25 315-23
3. Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell J C, Simske S and Goble J 1990 NOSER: an algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 2 66-75
4. Cohen-Bacrie C, Goussard Y and Guardo R 1997 Regularized reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography using a variance uniformization constraint IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16/5 562-71
5. Geselowitz D B 1971 An application of electrocdiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 18 38-41
6. Griffiths H 2001 Magnetic induction tomography Meas. Sci. Technol. 12 1126-31
7. Griffiths H, Steward W R and Gough W 1999 Magnetic induction tomography: a measuring system for biological tissues Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 873 335-45
8. Hanke M and Hansen P C 1993 Regularization methods for large-scale problems Surv. Math. Ind. 3 253-315
9. Hollaus K, Magele C, Brandstätter B, Merwa R and Scharfetter H 2002 Numerical simulation of the forward problem in magnetic induction tomography of biological tissue Proc. 10th IGTE Symp. 25 159-68
10. Hollaus K, Magele C, Merwa R and Scharfetter H 2004 Fast calculation of the sensitivity matrix in magnetic induction tomography by tetrahedral edge finite elements and the reciprocity theorem Physiol. Meas. 25 159-68
11. Korjenevsky A and Cherepenin V 1999 Progress in realization of magnetic induction tomography Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 873 346-52
12. Korjenevsky A, Cherepenin V and Sapetsky S 2000 Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization Physiol. Meas. 21 89-94
13. Korzhenevskii A and Cherepenin V 1997 Magnetic induction tomography J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 42 469-74
14. Merwa R, Hollaus K, Biro O and Scharfetter H 2004 Detection of brain oedema using magnetic induction tomography: a feasibility study of the likely sensitivity and detectability Physiol. Meas. 25 347-54
15. Merwa R, Hollaus K, Brandstätter B and Scharfetter H 2003 Numerical solution of the general 3D eddy current problem for magnetic induction tomography (spectroscopy) Physiol. Meas. 24 545-54
16. Mortarelli J R 1980 A generalization of the Geselowitz relationship useful in impedance plethysmographic field calculations IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27 665-7
17. Peyton A 1996 An overview of electromagnetic inductance tomography: description of three different systems Meas. Sci. Technol. 7 261-71
18. Rosell J, Casanas R and Scharfetter H 2001 Sensitivity maps and system requirements in magnetic induction tomography using a planar gradiometer Physiol. Meas. 22 121-30
19. Scharfetter H, Casanas R and Rosell J 2003 Biological tissue characterization by magnetic induction spectroscopy (MIS): requirements and limitations IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 870-80
20. Scharfetter H, Lackner H and Rosell J 2001 Magnetic induction tomography: hardware for multi-frequency measurements in biological tissues Physiol. Meas. 22 131-46
21. Scharfetter H, Merwa R and Pilz K 2005 A new type of gradiometer for the receiving circuit of magnetic induction tomography (MIT) Physiol. Meas. 26 S307-18
22. Scharfetter H, Rauchenzauner S, Merwa R, Biro O and Hollaus K 2004 Planar gradiometer for magnetic induction tomography (MIT): theoretical and experimental sensitivity maps for a low-contrast phantom Physiol. Meas. 25 325-33
23. Scharfetter H, Riu P, Populo M and Rosell J 2002 Sensitivity maps for low-contrast perturbations within conducting background in magnetic induction tomography Physiol. Meas. 23 195-202
24. Vauhkonen M, Karjalainen P A and Kaipio J P 1998 A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45 486-93