A gower maneuver: 1 the american society for bioethics and humanities’ resolution of the "taking stands" debate

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2004, Pages W24-W27

  Matheny Antommaria, Armand H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOETHICS AND HUMANITIES; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; CONFLICT; ETHICIST; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR BIOETHICS AND HUMANITIES; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BIOETHICS; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; ETHICAL RELATIVISM; ETHICISTS; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 23044489809     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651604773067523     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 1987. Statement on professional ethics. Available from: http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/Rbethics.htm
2. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 1999. Medical University of South Carolina administration backs down. Academe Online 85(4):6. Available from: http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/1999/99ja/JA99NB.HTM
3. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2002. What is censure? Available from: http://www.aaup.org/Coma/ prcenback.htm
4. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2003a. Academic Freedom and tenure: University of South Florida. Academe 89(3):59-73.
5. Available from: http://www.aaup.org/Com-a/Institutions/USF.htm
6. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). 2003b. Resolution Condemning the Administration of the University of South Florida. Available from: http:/ /www.aaup.org/Coma/ Institutions/USFresol.htm
7. American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the Association of American Colleges (AAC). 1940. 1940 statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure. Available from: http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/1940stat.htm
8. American Society of Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH). 2002. 5th annual meeting.
9. Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Brickley, P. 2002. Panel politics unresolved: Concerns continue over US advisory panels’ new make-up. The Scientist, 30 December. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20021230/ 05/
11. Brody B., N. Dubler, J. Blustein et al. 2002. Bioethics consultation in the private sector. Hastings Center Report 32(3): 14-20.
12. Elliott, C. 2001. Pharma buys a conscience. The American Prospect 12(17): 16-20.Available from: http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/17/elliott-c.html
13. Jonsen, A. R. 1991. Casuistry as methodology in clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine 12(4): 295-307.
14. Jos, P. H., M. F. Marshall, and M. Perlmutter. 1995. The Charleston policy on cocaine use during pregnancy: A cautionary tale. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 23:120-8.
15. Journal Editors and Authors Group. 2003. Uncensored exchange of scientific results. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(4): 1464. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0630491100v1.pdf
16. Montgomery, K. 2002. Letter to member. 28 August.
17. Nelson, H. L. 2001. The ASBH "taking stands" debate. ASBH Exchange 4(3): 1, 8.
18. Park, P. 2003. New standards for publication of sensitive research. The Scientist, 17 February. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030217/08
19. Youngner, S. J., and R. Arnold. 2002. Who will watch the watchers? Hastings Center Report 32(3): 21-2.