Marlow occlusion: Does it create or eliminate artifact?

Strabismus

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 53-54

  Brodsky, Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b ARKANSAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT REDUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EYELID CLOSURE; GAZE PARALYSIS; LETTER; MARLOW OCCLUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRABISMUS; STRABISMUS SURGERY; SUPERIOR OBLIQUE MUSCLE; ARTIFACT; HUMAN; NOTE; OPHTHALMOPLEGIA; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ARTIFACTS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOPLEGIA;

EID: 23044471831     PISSN: 09273972     EISSN: 17445132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09273970500265496     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Kolling GH, Steffen H, Baader A, Unnebrink K. Diagnostic occlusion test in cases of unilateral strabismus sursoadductorius. Strabismus. 2004;12:41-50.
2. Slavin ML, Potash SD, Rubin SE. Asymptomatic physiologic hyperdeviation in peripheral gaze. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:778-781.
3. Liesch A, Simonsz HJ. Up- and downshoot in adduction after monocular patching in normal individuals. Strabismus. 1993;1:25-36.
4. Neikter B. Effects of diagnostic occlusion on ocular alignment in normal subjects. Strabismus. 1994;2:67-77.
5. Van Rijn LJ, Ten Tusscher MPM, De Jong I, Hendrikse F. Asymmetrical vertical phorias indicating dissociated vertical deviation in subjects with normal binocular vision. Vision Res. 1998;38:2973-2978.
6. Duane A, Berens C. Ocular movements. Ophthalmol Lit. 1921;17:43-70.