Why chads? Determinants of voting equipment use in the United States

Public Choice

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 363-392

  Garner, Phillip ^a   Spolaore, Enrico ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044471407     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-005-7167-0     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Alesina, A., & Spolaore E. (2003). The size of nations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Ansolabehere, S., et al. (2001). "Residual votes attributable to technology. An assessment of reliability of existing voting Equipment." The Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project, March - accessed at http://www.vote. caltech.edu
4. Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(1), 155-173.
5. Brezis, E., Krugman, P., & Tsiddon, D. (1993). Leapfrogging in international competition: A theory of cycles in national technological leadership, American Economic Review, 83(5), 1211-1219.
6. Commission on Human Rights (2001). Draft staff report on voting irregularities in Florida during the 2000 presidential election, Washington DC.
7. The Economist (2001). Unfair, Again, June 9th.
8. Federal Election Commission (2001). Elections, www.fci.gov/elections. html.
9. Federal Election Commission and National Institute of Standards and Technology (1984). Voting systems standards: A report on the feasibility of developing voluntary standards for voting equipment, Washington DC.
10. Gore, A. (2000). Press Conference, November, Associated Press.
11. Knack, S., & Kropf, M. (2002). Who uses inferior voting technology'?, PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 541-548.
12. Knack, S., & Kropf, M. (2003). Voided ballots in the 1996 presidential election: A County-level analysis, Journal of Politics, 65(3), 881-897.
13. Lott, J.R. (2003). Nonvoted ballots and discrimination in Florida, Journal of Legal Studies, 32, 181-220.
14. Office of Federal Elections and National Bureau of Standards (1975). Effective use of computing technology in vote-tallying, Washington DC.
15. Saltman, R. (1988). Accuracy, integrity and security in computerized vote tallying, August, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
16. The Washington Post (2002). Remember Florida 2000.