The contradictory effects of pores on fatigue cracking of bone cement

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 747-753

  Janssen, Dennis ^a   Aquarius, René ^a   Stolk, Jan ^a   Verdonschot, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Fatigue; Finite element analysis; Porosity

Indexed keywords

CRACK INITIATION; CRACK PROPAGATION; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PORE SIZE; POROSITY;

CEMENT MANTLE; FATIGUE CRACKING; MACROCRACKS; POROSITY REDUCTION;

BONE CEMENT;

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TORQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

BONE CEMENTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POROSITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 23044451791     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30272     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ. The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:646-654.
2. Lewis G. Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:143-149.
3. Dunne NJ, Orr JF, Mushipe MT, Eveleigh RJ. The relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements. Biomaterials 2003;24:239-245.
4. Davies JP, Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Harris WH. Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged Simplex P bone cement. J Orthop Res 1987;5:366-371.
5. Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997; 344:44-60.
6. Ling RS, Lee AJ. Porosity reduction in acrylic cement is clinically irrelevant. Clin Orthop 1998;355:249-253.
7. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:135-154.
8. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials 1993;14:1165-1172.
9. Hertzler J, Miller MA, Mann KA. Fatigue crack growth rate does not depend on mantle thickness: An idealized cemented stem construct under torsional loading. J Orthop Res 2002;20: 676-682.
10. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Mann KA, Huiskes R. Prevention of mesh-dependent damage growth in finite element simulations of crack formation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomech 2003;36: 861-871.
11. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand 1993;64:699-716.
12. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R. Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement. Eng Fract Mech 2004;71: 513-528.
13. Stolk J, Maher SA, Verdonschot N, Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants? Clin Orthop 2003;409:138-150.
14. Chaboche JL. Continuum damage mechanics: Part 1-General concepts. J Appl Mech 1988;55:59-64.
15. Chaboche JL. Continuum damage mechanics: Part 2-Damage growth, crack initiation and crack growth. J Appl Mech 1988; 55:65-72.
16. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:575-581.
17. James SP, Schmalzried TP, McGarry FJ, Harris, WH. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: A preliminary study. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:71-78.
18. Race A, Miller MA, Ayers DC, Mann KA. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface. J Biomech 2003;36:489-396.
19. Lennon AB, Prendergast PJ. Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: Experimental and theoretical evidence. J Biomech 2002;35:311-321.
20. Bishop NE, Ferguson S, Tepic S. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:349-356.
21. Heuer DA, Mann KA. Fatigue fracture of the stem-cement interface with a clamped cantilever beam test. J Biomech Eng 2000;122:647-651.