Accounting for failures may improve precision: Evidence supporting improved validity of self-reported condom use

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 513-515

  Crosby, Richard ^a   Salazar, Laura F ^a   Diclemente, Ralph J ^b,d,e   Yarber, William L ^c,d   Caliendo, Angela M ^d   Staples Horne, Michelle ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex   (United States)

^f Georgia Dept of Juvenile Justice   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS; CHLAMYDIASIS; CONDOM; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GONORRHEA; HISPANIC; HUMAN; LIGASE CHAIN REACTION; NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREVALENCE; SAFE SEX; SELF REPORT; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHLAMYDIA INFECTIONS; CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS; CONDOMS; FEMALE; GEORGIA; GONORRHEA; HUMANS; NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE; PRISONERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF DISCLOSURE; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES; UNSAFE SEX;

EID: 23044444750     PISSN: 01485717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000170442.10150.28     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Zenilman JM, Weisman CS, Rompalo AM, et al. Condom use to prevent incident STDs: the validity of self-reported condom use. Sex Transm Dis 1995; 22:15-21.
2. Fishbein M, Peguegnat W. Evaluating AIDS prevention interventions using behavioral and biological outcome measures. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27:101-110.
3. Cates W. The NIH condom report: the glass is 90% full. Fam Plan Perspect 2001; 33:231-233.
4. Pequegnat W, Fishbein M, Celantano D, et al. The NIMH/APPC workgroup on behavioral and biological outcomes in HIV/STD prevention studies: a position statement. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27:127-132.
5. Peterman TA, Lin LS, Newman DR, et al. Does measured behavior reflect STD risk? an analysis of data from a randomized controlled behavioral intervention study. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27:446-451.
6. Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, et al. The value of consistent condom use: a study of STD prevention among African American adolescent females. Am J Public Health 2003; 93:901-902.
7. Crosby RA. Condom use as a dependent variable: measurement issues relevant to HIV prevention programs. AIDS Educ Prev 1998; 10: 448-457.
8. Devine OJ, Aral SO. The impact if inaccurate reporting of condom use and imperfect diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease infection in studies of condom effectiveness. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31:588-595.
9. United Sates Department of Health and Human Services. Workshop summary: scientific evidence on condom effectiveness for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention. Available at: http://www. niaid.nih.gov/dmid/stds/ condomreport.pdf. Accessed July 5, 2001.
10. Holmes KK, Levine R, Weaver M. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Public Health Rev 2004; 82:454-461.
11. Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Holtgrave DR, Wingood GM. Design, measurement, and analytic considerations for testing hypotheses relative to condom effectiveness against non-viral STIs. Sex Transm Infect 2002; 78:228-231.
12. Warner L, Clay-Warner J, Boles J, Williamson J. Assessing condom use practices: implications for evaluating method and user effectiveness. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 6:273-277.
13. Mertz KJ, Finelli L, Levine WC, et al. Gonorrhea in male adolescents and young adults in Newark, New Jersey: implications of risk factors and patient preferences for prevention strategies. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27:201-207.
14. Sanders SA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Crosby RA. Condom use errors and problems among young women who put condoms on their male partners. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2003; 58:95-98.
15. Crosby RA, Sanders SA, Yarber WL, Graham CA. Condom use errors and problems: a neglected aspect of studies assessing condom effectiveness. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24:367-370.
16. Civic D, Scholes D, Ichikawa L, et al. Ineffective use of condoms among young women in managed care. AIDS Care 2002; 14:779-788.
17. Macaluso M, Kelaghan J, Artz L, Austin H, et al. Mechanical failure of the latex condom in a cohort of women at high STD risk. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26:450-457.
18. Spruyt A, Steiner MJ, Joanis C, et al. Identifying condom users at risk for breakage and slippage: findings from three international sites. Am J Public Health 1998; 88:239-244.
19. Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Why do condoms break or slip off in use? an exploratory study. Int J STD AIDS 1995; 6:11-18.
20. Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Staples-Home M. Health issues of juvenile offenders. In: Moore J, ed. Management and Administration of Correctional Healthcare. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute; 2003:11-1-11-12.
21. Teplin LA, Mericle AA, McClelland GM, et al. HIV and AIDS risk behaviors in juvenile detainees: implications for public health policy. Am J Public Health 2003; 93:906-912.
22. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, et al. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 1998; 280:867-871.
23. Carroll KC, Aldeen WE, Morrison M, et al. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:1630-1603.
24. Lee HH et al. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet 1995; 345:213-216.
25. Smith KR et al. Evaluation of ligase chain reaction for use with urine for identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in females attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:455-457.
26. Van der Pol BD, Ferrero L, Buck-Barrington E, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens, female endocervical swabs, and male urethral swabs. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:1008-1016.