CH x hydrogenation on Co(0001): A density functional theory study

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Gong, Xue Qing ^a,b   Raval, R ^a,b   Hu, P ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY (DFT); ELEMENTARY REACTIONS; SUBSURFACES;

FISCHER-TROPSCH SYNTHESIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; REACTION KINETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

HYDROGENATION;

EID: 22944486041     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1829257     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. M. A. Vannice, Catal. Rev. - Sci. Eng. 14, 153 (1976).
2. H. Schulz, Appl. Catal., A 186, 3 (1999).
3. M. E. Dry, Catal. Today 71, 227 (2002).
4. B. H. Davis, Fuel Process. Technol. 71, 157 (2001).
5. M. Claeys and E. van Steen, Catal. Today 71, 419 (2002).
6. S. B. Ndlovu, N. S. Phala, M. Hearshaw-Timme, P. Beagly, J. R. Moss, M. Claeys, and E. van Steen, Catal. Today 71, 343 (2002).
7. B. Shi, J. Li, R. A. Keogh, and B. H. Davis, Appl. Catal., A 229, 283 (2002).
8. C. K. Rofer-DePoorter, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 81, 447 (1981).
9. R. C. Brady III and R. Pettit, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 1287 (1981).
10. F. Fischer and H. Tropsch, Brennst.-Chem. 4, 276 (1923);
11. 7, 97 (1926).
12. A. M. Hilmen, D. Schanke, K. F. Hanssen, and A. Holmen, Appl. Catal., A 186, 169 (1999).
13. R. C. Brady III and R. Pettit, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 6181 (1980).
14. J. J. C. Geerlings, M. C. Zonnevylle, and C. P. M. de Groot, Surf. Sci. 241, 302 (1991).
15. J. Patzlaff, Y. Liu, C. Graffmann, and J. Gaube, Appl. Catal., A 186, 109 (1999).
16. M. L. Turner, N. Marsih, B. E. Mann, R. Quyoum, H. C. Long, and P. M. Maitlis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10456 (2002).
17. Q. Ge, M. Neurock, H. A. Wright, and N. Srinivasan, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 2826 (2002).
18. I. M. Ciobîcǎ, G. J. Kramer, Q. Ge, M. Neurock, and R. A. van Santen, J. Catal. 212, 136 (2002).
19. C. A. Mims and L. E. McCandlish, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 929 (1987).
20. B. Shi, J. Li, R. A. Keogh, and B. H. Davis, Appl. Catal., A 229, 283 (2002).
21. B. Shi and B. H. Davis, Catal. Today 58, 225 (2000).
22. P. M. Maitlis and M. L. Turner, Catal. Today 65, 91 (2001).
23. H. Yang and J. L. Whitten, Surf. Sci. 289, 30 (1993).
24. H. Yang and J. L. Whitten, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 126 (1989).
25. I. M. Ciobîcǎ, F. Frechard, R. A. van Santen, A. W. Kleyn, and J. Hafner, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3364 (2000).
26. I. M. Ciobîcǎ and R. A. van Santen, J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 6200 (2002).
27. (a) A. Michaelides and P. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9866 (2000);
28. (b) A. Michaelides and P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 2523 (2001);
29. (c) 114, 5792 (2001).
30. (a) C. J. Zhang and P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 322 (2002);
31. (b) 116, 4281 (2002).
32. (a) A. Michaelides and P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8120 (2000);
33. (b) 112, 6006 (2000).
34. I. M. Ciobîcǎ, Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2002.
35. A. Kogelbauer, J. C. Weber, and J. G. Goodwin, Jr., Catal. Lett. 34, 259 (1995);
36. J. Li, G. Jacobs, Y. Zhang, T. Das, and B. H. Davis, Appl. Catal., A 223, 195 (2002);
37. G. Bian, T. Nanba, N. Koizumi, and M. Yamada, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 178, 219 (2002).
38. J. Wilson and C. de Groot, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 7860 (1995).
39. (a) J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, and C. Fiolhais, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992);
40. (b) D. Vanderbilt, 41, 7892 (1990).
41. 3 on the flat and stepped Co(0001). Different surface Monkhorst Pack meshes of k-point sampling in the surface Brillouin zone were used for the p(2×2) and p(4×2) unit cells. The results are listed in the table below. As can be seen, the chemisorption energy differences using these different k-point samplings are small. In this work, we reported results using the k-point samplings of (5×5×1) for p(2×2) unit cells and (2×5×1) for p(4×2) unit cells (stepped surfaces), respectively.
42. (a) X.-Q. Gong, P. Hu, and R. Raval, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 6324 (2003);
43. (b) X.-Q. Gong, Z.-P. Liu, R. Raval, and P. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8 (2004).
44. Z.-P. Liu and P. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 12596 (2001).
45. 3 on the flat and stepped Co(0001). In the calculations, the top two layers of the metal atoms on both flat and stepped surfaces were relaxed, as well as the adsorbates. The TSs geometries from surface relaxed systems are almost identical to those of unrelaxed systems. The chemisorption energies and the barriers are listed in the table below. As can be seen, the differences of chemisorption energies and barriers between surface relaxed and unrelaxed systems are very small. In addition, the surface relaxation effect has been tested for other systems in our group and it has been found that it is indeed small [Refs. 34 (a), 38].
46. D. J. Klinke II, D. J. Dooling, and L. J. Broadbelt, Surf. Sci. 425, 334 (1999);
47. D. J. Klinke II, S. Wilke, and L. J. Broadbelt, J. Catal. 178, 540 (1998);
48. D. J. Klinke II and L. J. Broadbelt, Surf. Sci. 429, 169 (1999).
49. X.-Q. Gong, R. Raval, and P. Hu, Surf. Sci. 562, 247 (2004).
50. I. F. Silva, D. W. McKee, and L. S. Lobo, J. Catal. 170, 54 (1997).
51. G. A. Somorjai, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 424, 101 (1998);
52. G. A. Somorjai, Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (Wiley, New York, 1994), pp. 483-500.
53. F. Steinbach, J. Kiss, and R. Krall, Surf. Sci. 157, 401 (1985).
54. Z.-P. Liu and P. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1958 (2003).