|
|
|
Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-34
|
|
The greater good?: issues of proportionality and democracy in the doctrine of necessity as applied in Re A.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONJOINED TWINS;
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
INFANT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
POLITICAL SYSTEM;
RE A (CHILDREN) (CONJOINED TWINS: SURGICAL SEPARATION);
SOCIOECONOMICS;
SURGERY;
UNITED KINGDOM;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
RE A (CHILDREN) (CONJOINED TWINS: SURGICAL SEPARATION);
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEMOCRACY;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
TWINS, CONJOINED;
VALUE OF LIFE;
|
|
EID: 22944477406
PISSN: 14737795
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (10)
|
|
References (0)
|
