The Role of Teacher Stance When Infusing Inquiry Questioning Into Middle School Science Classrooms

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 143-153

  MacKenzie, Ann Haley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944475603     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18017.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agar, M.H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York : Academic Press.
2. Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
3. Brookfeld, S. & Presknell, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
4. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds possible worlds. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
5. Claxton, G. (1991). Educating the enquiring mind: The challenge for school science. Harvester, UK : Wheatsleaf.
6. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
7. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
8. Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. New York : Teachers College Press.
9. Feldman, C., & Wertsch, J. (1986). Context dependent properties of teachers' speech. Youth and Society 8, 227–258.
10. Haley-Oliphant MacKenzie, A. (1994). Exploration, risk-taking, and wonderment: Traveling to the margins of instruction. In A.E. Haley-Oliphant MacKenzie (Ed.) Exploring the place of exemplary science teaching. (pp. 99–114). Washington, DC : American Association for the Advancement of Science.
11. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
12. Milgrim, J. (1985). The ninth grader: A profile. In How fares the ninth grade: A day in the life of a ninth grader. (pp. 2–9). Reston, VA : National Association of Secondary School Principals.
13. Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. (Eds). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC : American Association for the Advancement of Science.
14. Minstrell, J. (2000). Implications for teaching and learning inquiry: A summary. In J. Minstrell & E. van Zee (Eds). (Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC : American Association for the Advancement of Science.
15. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1996). Adolescent and young adulthood/science standards. Detroit, MI : Author.
16. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
17. Oakeschott, M. (1962). Rationalism in politics. London : Methuen.
18. Patton, P.J. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
19. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining foucault, feminism, power, and the body. London : Routledge.
20. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York : Basic Books.
21. Tobin, K. (1998). Issues and trends in the teaching of science. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 129–151). Great Britain : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. Uno, G. (1990). Inquiry in the classroom. Bioscience, 40, 841–843.
23. Windschitl, M. (1999). The challenges of sustaining a constructivist classroom culture. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 751–755.
24. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
25. Yinger, R. J., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1994). Improvising learning conversations. In A.E. Haley-Oliphant MacKenzie, Ed., Exploring the place of exemplary science teaching (pp. 125–138). Washington, DC : American Association for the Advancement of Science.