Speech interactions with linguistic, cognitive, and visuomotor tasks

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 295-305

  Dromey, Christopher ^a   Bates, Emily ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Divided attention; Language; Motor; Speech kinematics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RESEARCH; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; LIP; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 22944475334     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/020)     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225-235.
2. Carnahan, H., Elliott, D., & Lee, T. D. (1986). Dual-task interference between speaking and listening and a unipedal force production task. Neuropsychologia, 24, 583-586.
3. Chang, P., & Hammond, G. R. (1987). Mutual interactions between speech and finger movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 265-274.
4. Dromey, C. (2000). Articulatory kinematics in patients with Parkinson disease using different speech treatment approaches. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 155-161.
5. Dromey, C., & Benson, A. (2003). Effects of concurrent motor, linguistic or cognitive tasks on speech motor performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1234-1246.
6. Dromey, C., & Ramig, L. (1998a). The effect of lung volume on selected phonatory and articulatory variables. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 491-502.
7. Dromey, C., & Ramig, L. (1998b). Intentional changes in sound pressure level and rate: Their impact on measures of respiration, phonation and articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1003-1018.
8. Dromey, C., Ramig, L. O., & Johnson, A. B. (1995). Phonatory and articulatory changes associated with increased vocal intensity in Parkinson disease: A case study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 751-764.
9. Dromey, C., Stathopoulos, E. T., & Sapienza, C. M. (1992). Glottal airflow and electroglottographic measures of vocal function at multiple intensities. Journal of Voice, 6, 44-54.
10. Elliott, D., Weeks, D. J., Lindley, S., & Jones, R. (1986). Sex differences in dual-task interference between speaking and a manual force-production task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 3-8.
11. Friedman, A., Polson, M. C., & Dafoe, C. G. (1988). Dividing attention between the hands and the head: Performance trade-offs between rapid finger tapping and verbal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 60-68.
12. Gordon, P. A., Luper, H. L., & Peterson, H. A. (1986). The effects of syntactic complexity on the occurrence of disfluencies in 5 year old nonstutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 11, 151-164.
13. Hiscock, M., Kinsbourne, M., Samuels, M., & Krause, A. E. (1985). Effects of speaking upon the rate and variability of concurrent finger tapping in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 486-500.
14. Ho, A., Iansek, R., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2002). The effect of a concurrent task on Parkinsonian speech. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 36-47.
15. Jou, J., & Harris, R. J. (1992). The effect of divided attention on speech production. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 301-304.
16. Klapp, S. T., Porter-Graham, K. A., & Hoifjeld, A. R. (1991). The relation of perception and motor action: Ideomotor compatibility and interference in divided attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 155-162.
17. Kleinow, J., & Smith, A. (2000). Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 548-559.
18. LaBarba, R. C., Bowers, C. A., Kingsberg, S. A., & Freeman, G. (1987). The effects of concurrent vocalization on foot and hand motor performance: A test of the functional distance hypothesis. Cortex, 23, 301-308.
19. Maner, K. J., Smith, A., & Grayson, L. (2000). Influences of utterance length and complexity on speech motor performance in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 560-573.
20. Masterson, J. J., & Kamhi, A. G. (1992). Linguistic trade-offs in school-age children with and without language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1064-1075.
21. MathWorks. (2001). MATLAB (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. Natick, MA: Author.
22. McLeod, P. (1977). A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 651-667.
23. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255.
24. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
25. Ratner, N. B., & Sih, C. C. (1987). Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children's dysfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 278-287.
26. Seitz, K., & Schumann-Hengsteler, R. (2000). Mental multiplication and working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 552-570.
27. Seitz, K., & Schumann-Hengsteler, R. (2002). Phonological loop and central executive processes in mental addition and multiplication. Psychologische Beitrage, 44, 275-302.
28. Seth-Smith, M., Ashton, R., & McFarland, K. (1989). A dual-task study of sex differences in language reception and production. Cortex, 25, 425-431.
29. Silverman, S. W., & Ratner, N. B. (1997). Syntactic complexity, fluency, and accuracy of sentence imitation in adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 95-106.
30. Simon, T. J., & Sussman, H. M. (1987). The dual task paradigm: Speech dominance or manual dominance? Neuropsychologia, 25, 559-569.
31. Smith, A., Goffman, L., Zelaznik, H. N., Ying, G., & McGillem, C. (1995). Spatiotemporal stability and patterning of speech movement sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 493-501.
32. Smith, A., McFarland, D. H., & Weber, C. M. (1986). Interactions between speech and finger movements: An exploration of the dynamic pattern perspective. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 471-480.
33. Spelke, E., Hirst, W., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215-230.
34. Strand, E. A., & McNeil, M. R. (1996). Effects of length and linguistic complexity on temporal acoustic measures in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1018-1033.
35. Tasko, S. M., & McClean, M. D. (2004). Variations in articulatory movement with changes in speech task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 85-100.
36. Tingley, S., & Dromey, C. (2000). Phonatory-articulatory relationships: Do speakers with spasmodic dysphonia show aberrant lip kinematic profiles? Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 249-252.
37. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. F. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.