Incremental knowledge management of web community groups on web portals

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3336, Issue , 2004, Pages 198-207

  Kim, Yang Sok ^a   Park, Sung Sik ^a   Kang, Byeong Ho ^a   Choi, Young Ju ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; PORTALS; TREES (MATHEMATICS); WEB BROWSERS; WORLD WIDE WEB; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

CONTENT AGGREGATION; CONTENT SYNDICATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PORTAL SERVICES; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; EVALUATION STUDY; GENERATION TOOLS; INFORMATION CLASSIFICATION; LEVEL OF SERVICE; MULTIPLE CLASSIFICATION RIPPLE DOWN RULES; WEB COMMUNITY; WEB INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PORTALS;

EID: 22944473631     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30545-3_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Wege, C., Portal Server Technology. IEEE Internet Computing, 2002. 6(3): p. 73-77.
2. Priebe, T. and G. Pernul. Towards integrative enterprise knowledge portals. in Twelfth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2003. New Orleans, LA, USA: Publisher ACM Press New York, NY, USA.
3. Park, S.S., S.K. Kim, and B.H. Kang. Web Information Management System: Personalization and Generalization, in the IADIS International Confernece WWW/Internet 2003. 2003.
4. Alavi, M. and D.E. Leidner, Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits. Communications of the AIS, 1999. 1(2).
5. Manber, U., A. Patel, and J. Robison, Experience with personalization on Yahoo! Communications of the ACM, 2000. vol.43, no.8: p. 35-39.
6. Bellas, F., D. Fernandez, and A. Muino. A flexible framework for engineering "my" portals, in 13th conference on World Wide Web. 2004. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press New York, NY, USA.
7. Rossi, G., D. Schwabe, and R. Guimaraes. Designing personalized web applications. in tenth international conference on World Wide Web. 2001. Hong Kong, Hong Kong: ACM Press New York, NY, USA.
8. Brusilovsky, P. and M.T. Maybury, From adaptive hypermedia to the adaptive web. Communications of the ACM, 2002. 45(5): p. 30-33.
9. Feigenbaum, E.A., Knowledge engineering: The applied side of artificial intelligence. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences, 1984. 246: p. 91-107.
10. Kang, B., P. Compton, and P. Preston. Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules : Evaluation and Possibilities. in 9th AAAI-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop. 1995., Banff, Canada, University of Calgary.
11. Kang, B.H., W. Gambetta, and P. Compton, Verification and validation with ripple-down rules. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1996. vol.44, no.2: p. 257-269.
12. Kim, Y.S., et al. Adaptive Web Document Classification with MCRDR. in International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing ITCC 2004. 2004. Orleans, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
13. Lu, B., S.C. Hui, and Y. Zhang. Personalized Information Monitoring Over the Web. in FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & APPLICATIONS (ICITA 2002). 2002. BATHURST, AUSTRALIA.
14. Liu, L., C. Pu, and W. Tang. WebCQ: Detecting and Delivering Information Changes on the Web. in International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). 2000. Washington D.C.: ACM Press.
15. Pandey, S., K. Ramamritham, and S. Chakrabarti. Monitoring the dynamic web to respond to continuous queries, in International World Wide Web Conference. 2003. Budapest, Hungary.
16. Tang, W., L. Liu, and C. Pu. WebCQ Detecting and Delivering Information Changes on the Web. in Proc. Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). 2000.
17. Tan, B., S. Foo, and S.C. Hui, Web Information Monitoring: an Analysis of Web Page Updates. Online Information Review, 2001. 25(1): p. 6-18.
18. Brandt, S. and A. Kristensen. Web push as an internet notification service. 1997.
19. Hahn, J. and J. Kim. Why are some representations (sometimes) more effective? in 20th International Conference on Information Systems. 1999. Charlotte, North Carolina, United States: Association for Information Systems Atlanta, GA, USA.
20. Larkin, J. and H. Simon, Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 1987. 11: p. 65-99.
21. Ford, K.M., et al., Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1993. vol.8, no.1: p. 9-32.
22. Kang, B.H., P. Compton, and P. Preston, Validating incremental knowledge acquisition for multiple classifications. Critical Technology: Proceedings of the Third World Congress on Expert Systems, 1996: p. 856-868.
23. Compton, P. and D. Richards, Generalising ripple-down rules. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management Methods, Models, and Tools. 12th International Conference, EKAW 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol.1937), 2000: p. 380-386.
24. Mladenic, D., Text-learning and Related Intelligent Agents. Applications of Intelligent Information Retrieval, 1999.
25. Wada, T., et al. Integrating Inductive learning and Knowledge Acquisition in the Ripple Down Rules Method, in 6th Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop. 2000. Sydney, Australia.
26. Suryanto, H. and P. Compton. Intermediate Concept Discovery in Ripple Down Rule Knowledge Bases, in 2002 Pacific Rim Knowledge Acquisition Workshop. 2002. Tokyo, Japan.