The comparative neurotoxicity of intrathecal lidocaine and bupivacaine in rats

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 541-547

  Sakura, Shinichi ^a   Kirihara, Yumiko ^a   Muguruma, Tomoko ^a   Kishimoto, Tomomune ^a   Saito, Yoji ^a  

^a SHIMANE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG POTENCY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; LATENT PERIOD; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; NERVE INJURY; NEUROTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCORING SYSTEM; TAIL FLICK TEST;

EID: 22944468464     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000155960.61157.12     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Drasner K, Sakura S, Chan VWS, et al. Persistent sacral sensory deficit induced by intrathecal local anesthetic infusion in the rat. Anesthesiology 1994;80:847-52.
2. Sakura S, Chan VWS, Ciriales R, Drasner K. The addition of 7.5% glucose does not alter the neurotoxicity of 5% lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Anesthesiology 1995;82: 236-40.
3. Sakura S, Bollen AW, Ciriales R, Drasner K. Local anesthetic neurotoxicity does not result from blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Anesth Analg 1995;81:338-46.
4. Hashimoto K, Sakura S, Bollen AW, et al. Comparative toxicity of glucose and lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998;23:444-50.
5. Rigler ML, Drasner K, Krejcie TC, et al. Cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991;72: 275-81.
6. Schell RM, Brauer FS, Cole DJ, Applegate RL II. Persistent sacral nerve root deficits after continuous spinal anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:908-11.
7. Auroy Y, Narchi P, Messiah A, et al. Serious complications related to regional anesthesia: results of a prospective survey in France. Anesthesiology 1997;87:479-86.
8. Gerancher JC. Cauda equina syndrome following a single spinal administration of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre needle. Anesthesiology 1997;87:687-9.
9. Kishimoto T, Bollen AW, Drasner K. Comparative spinal neurotoxicity of prilocaine and lidocaine. Anesthesiology 2002;97: 1250-3.
10. Kirihara Y, Saito Y, Sakura S, et al. Comparative neurotoxicity of intrathecal and epidural lidocaine in rats. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:961-8.
11. Sakura S, Hashimoto K, Bollen AW, et al. Intrathecal catheterization in the rat: an improved technique for morphologic analysis of drug-induced injury. Anesthesiology 1996;85:1184-9.
12. Lambert LA, Lambert DH, Strichartz GR. Irreversible conduction block in isolated nerve by high concentrations of local anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1994;80:1082-93.
13. Kasaba T, Onizuka S, Takasaki M. Procaine and mepivacaine have less toxicity in vitro than other clinically used local anesthetics. Anesth Analg 2003;97:85-90.
14. Kalichman MW, Moorhouse DF, Powell HC, Myers RR. Relative neural toxicity of local anesthetics. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1993;52:234-40.
15. Li DF, Bahar M, Cole G, Rosen M. Neurological toxicity of the subarachnoid infusion of bupivacaine, lignocaine, or 2-chloroprocaine in the rat. Br J Anaesth 1985;57:424-9.
16. Yamashita A, Matsumoto M, Matsumoto S, et al. A comparison of the neurotoxic effects on the spinal cord of tetracaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine administered intrathecally in rabbits. Anesth Analg 2003;97:512-9.