Co-registration of X-ray and MR fields of view in a hybrid XMR system

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 291-301

  Yu, Huanzhou ^a,b,c   Fahrig, Rebecca ^b   Pelc, Norbert J ^a,b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fiducial markers; FOV co registration; Geometric parameters; Gradient nonlinearity; XMR systems

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; X RAY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 22944454634     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20376     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adam G, Neuerburg J, Bucker A, et al. Interventional magnetic resonance, initial clinical experience with a 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance system combined with c-arm fluoroscopy. Invest Radiol 1997;32:191-197.
2. Rhode KS, Hill DL, Edwards PJ, et al. Registration and tracking to integrate X-ray and MR images in an XMR facility. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:1369-1378.
3. Fahrig R, Butts K, Wen Z, et al. Truly hybrid interventional MR/X-ray system: investigation of in vivo applications. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:1200-1207.
4. Fahrig R, Butts K, Rowlands JA, et al. A truly hybrid interventional MR/X-ray system: feasibility demonstration. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:294-300.
5. Wen Z, Fahrig R, Pelc NJ. X-ray tube in parallel magnetic fields. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging Meeting 5030. San Diego, 2003. p 972-979.
6. Wen Z, Fahrig R, Pelc NJ. Permanent magnet shimming for the X-ray detector in a hybrid X-ray/MR system. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004. Abstract 971.
7. Blum U, Rossle M, Haag K, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: technical, hemodynamic, and clinical results of treatment with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Radiology 1995;197:805-811.
8. Henig I, Prough SG, Cheatwood M, DeLong E. Hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy In infertility. A comparative study. J Reprod Med 1991;36:573-575.
9. Fahrig R, Heit G, Wen Z, Daniel BL, Butts K, Pelc NJ. First use of a truly-hybrid X-ray/MR imaging system for guidance of brain biopsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:995-997: discussion 997.
10. Oue T, Fukuzawa M, Kusafuka T, Kohmoto Y, Okada A. Imura K. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatoblastoma. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1771-1775.
11. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, Maurer Jr CR, Maciunas RJ. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001;48:810-816; discussion 816-817.
12. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB, Maurer Jr CR. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17: 694-702.
13. Panigrahy A, Caruthers SD, Krejza J, et al. Registration of three-dimensional MR and CT studies of the cervical spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:282-289.
14. Weese J, Penney GP, Desmedt P, Buzug TM, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ. Voxel-based 2-D/3-D registration of fluoroscopy images and CT scans for image-guided surgery. IEEE Trans Info Technol Biomed 1997;1:284-293.
15. Wang LL, Tsai WH. Camera calibration by vanishing lines for 3-D computer vision. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 1991;13: 370-376.
16. Rougee A, Picard C, Ponchut C, Trousset Y. Geometrical calibration of X-ray imaging chains for three-dimensional reconstruction. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1993;17:295-300.
17. Sumanaweera TS, Glover GH, Binford TO, Adler JR. MR Susceptibility misregistration correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993;12: 251-259.
18. Hemler P, Van Den Elsen P, Sumanaweera T, Napel S, Drace J, Adler JR. A quantitative comparison of residual error for three different multimodality registration techniques. In: Bizais Y, Barillot C, Paola RD. editors. Information processing in medical imaging. Boston: Kluwer; 1995, P251-262.
19. Sumanaweera TS. Segmentation and distortion correction in medical imaging. Ph.D dissertation, Stanford University. Stanford, CA, 1992.
20. O'Donnell M, Edelstein WA. NMR imaging in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities and gradient field nonlinearities. Med Phys 1985;12:20-26.
21. Sumanaweera TS, Adler Jr JR, Napel S, Glover GH. Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implications for stereotactic surgery. Neurosurgery 1994;35:696-703: discussion 703-704.
22. Sumanaweera TS, Adler JR, Glover GH, et al. Method for correcting magnetic resonance image distortion for frame-based stereotactic surgery, with preliminary results. J Image Guided Surg 1995;1: 151-157.
23. Sumanaweera TS, Glover GH, Hemler PF, et al. MR geometric distortion correction for improved frame-based stereotaxic target localization accuracy. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:106-113.
24. Masutani Y, Dohi T, Yamane F, Iseki H, Takakura K. Augmented reality visualization system for intravascular neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 1998;3:239-247.
25. Liu H, Yu Y, Schell MC, O'Dell WG, Ruo R, Okunieff P. Optimal marker placement in photogrammetry patient positioning system. Med Phys 2003;30:103-110.
26. Frayne R, Cowman LM, Rickey DW, et al. A geometrically accurate vascular phantom for comparative studies of x-ray, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance vascular imaging: construction and geometrical verification. Med Phys 1993;20:415-425.
27. Castleman KR. Digital image processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1996.