Knowledge discovery using concept-class taxonomies

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3339, Issue , 2004, Pages 450-461

  Kolluri, Venkateswarlu ^a   Provost, Foster ^b   Buchanan, Bruce ^c   Metzler, Douglas ^c  

^a Chitika Inc   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; DATA MINING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

DATA SETS; HIGH-LEVEL RULES; SPECIFIC LEARNING; TAXONOMY;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 22944439391     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30549-1_40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. th Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann
2. nd Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp: 355-358, Menlo Park, CA, AAAI Press.
3. rd Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New Port Beach, CA.
4. Blake, C.L. & Merz, C.J. (1998). UCI Repository of machine learning databases [http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html]. Irvine, CA: University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science.
5. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olsen, R. A., and P. J. Stone (1984). Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Corp., CA.
6. Buchanan, B. G. and Mitchell, T. M. (1978). Model-directed learning of production rules. In D Waterman and F Hayes-Roth, editors, Pattern Directed Inference Systems. Academic Press., New York, NY.
7. Fürnkranz. J. (1999) Separate-and-Conquer Rule Learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 13(1) pp:3-54, 1999.
8. nd Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp: 232-238
9. Koller, D. and Sahami, M. 1997 Hierarchically Classifying Documents Using Very Few Words. In Proc. of the 14th Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 170-178, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Krenzelok, E., Jacobsen T., and Aronis J. M. (1995) Jimsonweed (datura-stramonium) poisoning and abuse: an analysis of 1,458 cases. In Proc. of North American Congress of Clinical Toxicology, Rochester NY.
11. McCallum, A., Rosenfeld, R., Mitchell, T. and Nigam, K. (1998) Improving Text Classification by Shrinkage in Hierarchy of Classes. In Proc. Of the 15th Intl. Conf. in Machine Learning.
12. Michalski, R. S. (1980). Inductive Rule-Guided Generalization and Conceptual Simplification of Symbolic Descriptions: Unifying Principles and Methodology. Workshop on Current Developments in Machine Learning. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
13. Pazzani, M., Merz, C., Murphy, P., Ali, K., Hume, T. and Brunk, C. (1994). Reducing Misclassification Costs. In Proc of the 11th Intl. Conf. of Machine Learning, New Brunswick. Morgan Kaufmann
14. Provost, F. J. and Buchanan, B.G. (1995). Inductive Policy: The Pragmatics of Bias Selection. Machine Learning (20).
15. Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
16. Reich, R. & Fenves. R. (1989). Incremental Learning for Capturing Design Expertise. Technical Report: EDRC 12-34-89, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
17. Taylor, M. G., Stoffel K., and Hendler J. A. (1997) Ontology-based Induction of High Level Classification Rules. In Proc. of the SIGMOD 18.
18. Turney, P. D., (1995). Cost-sensitive classification: Empirical Evaluation of a Hybrid Genetic Decision Tree Induction Algorithm, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2, March, 369-409.