What is the value of replicating other studies?

Research Evaluation

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 189-195

  Park, Caroline L ^a  

^a ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944432491     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154404781776400     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. M Agar (2004), 'Know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em: qualitative thinking outside of the university', Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), pages 100-112.
2. Y Amir (1990), 'Replication research: a 'must' for the scientific advancement of psychology', in Neuliep, Handbook, pages 51-70.
3. W Bechtel (2002), 'Aligning multiple research techniques in cognitive neuroscience: why is it important?', Philosophy of Science, 69, S48-S58.
4. H Berman, M Ford-Gilboe and J C Campbell (1998), 'Combining stories and numbers: a methodologic approach for a critical nursing sciences', Advances in Nursing Science, 211, pages 1-15.
5. R F Bornstein (1990), 'Publication, politics, experimenter bias and the replication process in social science research' in Neuliep, Handbook, pages 71-82.
6. H M Collins (1992), Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
7. R W Easley, C S Madden and M G Dunn (2000), 'Conducting marketing science: the role of replication in the research processes', Journal of Business Research, 48, pages 83-92.
8. R D Garrison, T Anderson and W Archer (2001), 'Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education', American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), pages 1-18.
9. C Hendrick (1990), 'Replications, strict replications and conceptual replications: are they important?', in Neuliep, Handbook, pages 45-48.
10. P D Hutcheon (1995), 'Popper and Kuhn on the evolution of science, Brock Review, 4(1/2), pages 28-37.
11. P A Lamal (1990), 'On the importance of replication', in Neuliep, Handbook, pages 31-36.
12. S McKelvie (1990), 'Personal comment on replications', in Neuliep, Handbook, pages 83-84.
13. J M Morse and C Mitcham (2002), 'Exploring qualitatively derived concepts: inductive-deductive pitfalls', International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (4).
14. J W Neuliep (editor) (1990), Handbook of Replication Research in the Behavioural Social Sciences (Selected Press, Madeira, CA).
15. P M Pyett (2003), 'Validation of qualitative research in the 'real world', Qualitative Health Research, 13(8), pages 1170-1179.
16. K Raman (1994), 'Inductive inference and replications: a Bayesian perspective', Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), pages 633-643.
17. P R Rosenbaum (2001), 'Replicating effects and biases', American Statistician, 55(3), pages 223-227.
18. R Rosenthal (1990), 'Replication in behavioural research', in Neuliep, Handbook, pages 1-10.
19. J R Rossiter (2003), 'Qualifying the importance of findings', Journal of Business Research, 56, pages 85-88.
20. K Sing, S H Ang and S M Leong (2003), 'Increasing replication for knowledge accumulation in strategy research', Journal of Management, 29(4), pages 533-549.
21. B Sternthal (1994), 'Editorial', Journal of Consumer Research, 21.
22. E W K Tsang and K M Kwan (1999), 'Replication and theory development in organizational science: a critical realistic perspective', Academy of Management Review, 24(4), pages 759-780.
23. W D Wells (1993), 'Discovery-oriented consumer research', Journal of Consumer Research, 19, pages 489-504.