Rings with countably many direct summands

Communications in Algebra

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 757-769

  Birkenmeier, Gary F ^a   Kim, Jin Yong ^b   Park, Jae Keol ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^c Pusan National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844456954     PISSN: 00927872     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. S. K. Berberian, Baer *-Rings, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. Band 195, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972.
2. G. F. Birkenmeier, J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, When is the CS condition hereditary?, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), 3875-3885.
3. A. W. Chatters and C. R. Hajarnavis, Rings in which every complemented right ideal is a direct summand, Quart. J. Math. (2)28 (1980), 61-81.
4. A. W. Chatters and S. M. Khuri, Endomorphism rings of modules over nonsingular CS-rings, J. London Math. Soc. (2)21 (1980), 434-444.
5. W. E. Clark, Twisted matrix units semigroup algebras, Duke Math. J. 34 (1967), 417-423.
6. N. V. Dung and P. F. Smith, Hereditary CS-modules, Math. Scand. 71 (1992), 173-180.
7. N. V. Dung, D. V. Huynh, P. F. Smith and R. Wisbauer, Extending Modules, Longman, Harlow, 1994.
8. K. R. Goodearl, Von Neumann Regular Rings, Krieger, Malabar, 1991.
9. N. Jacobson, Structure of Rings, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 37, Providence, 1964.
10. L. Jeremy, Sur les modules et anneaux quasi-continus, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 273 (1971), 80-83.
11. I. Kaplansky, Topological representation of algebras,II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), 62-75.
12. I. Kaplansky, Any orthocomplemented complete modular lattice is a continuous geometry, Ann. Math. 61 (1955), 524-541.
13. I. Kaplansky, Rings of Operators, Benjamin, New York, 1968.
14. J. Y. Kim and J. K. Park, When is a regular ring semisimple Artinian?, Math. Japonica 45 (1997), 311-313.
15. J. Lawrence, A countable self-injective ring is quasi-Frobenius, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 65 (1977), 217-220.
16. S. H. Mohamed and B. J. Müller, Continuous and Discrete Modules, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note 147, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1980.
17. W. K. Nicholson, J. K. Park and M. F. Yousif, On simple-injective rings, preprint.
18. B. L. Osofsky, A generalization of quasi-Frobenius rings, J. Algebra 4 (1966), 373-389.
19. A. Pollingher and A. Zaks, On Baer and quasi-Baer rings, Duke Math. J. 37 (1970), 127-138.
20. K. M. Rangaswamy, Regular and Baer rings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1974), 354-358.
21. C. E. Rickart, Banach algebras with an adjoint operation, Ann. Math. 47 (1946), 528-550.
22. S. Sherman, The second adjoint of a C* -algebra, Proc. Intern. Cong. Math. Cambridge 1 (1950), 470.
23. L. W. Small, Semihereditary rings, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 656-658.
24. Z. Takeda, Conjugate spaces of operator algebras, Proc. Japan Acad. 30 (1954), 90-95.
25. M. L. Teply, Right hereditary, right perfect rings are semiprimary, Advances in Ring Theory (eds. S. K. Jain and S. T. Rizvi), Birkhäuser, Boston (1997), 313-316.
26. Y. Utumi, On continuous rings and self-injective rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (1965), 158-173.