State and local government relations in the era of standards-based reform: Standards, state policy instruments, and local instructional policy making

Educational Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 546-572

  Spillane, James P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844456315     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904899013004004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barbeau, E. J. (1989, September) Mathematics for the public. Paper presented at a meeting of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction, University of Leeds, UK.
2. Bardach, E. (1980). Implementation studies and the study of implements. Paper presented at the 1980 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
3. Bardach, E. (1982). Self-regulation and regulatory paperwork. In E. Bardach & R. Kagan (Eds.), Social regulation: Strategies for reform (pp. 315-340). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
4. Boyd, B. (1976). The public, the professionals, and educational policy making: Who governs? Teachers College Record, 77(4), 547-549.
5. Cohen, D. (1996). Standards-based school reform: Policy, practice, and performance. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable (pp. 99-127). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 249-256.
7. Cohen, D. K., & Barnes, C. A. (1993). Pedagogy and policy, and conclusion: A new pedagogy for policy? In D. K. Cohen, M. W. McLaughlin, & J. E. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 207-275). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 18, 3-50.
9. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990 (2nd. ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Romberg, T. (1983). A common curriculum for mathematics. In G. D. Fenstermacher & J. Goodlad (Eds.), Individual differences and the common curriculum (pp. 121-159). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
11. Schwille, J., Porter, A., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Knappen, L., Kuhs, T., & Schmidt, W. (1983). Teachers as policy brokers in the content of elementary school mathematics. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 370-391). New York: Longman.
12. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). New York and Philadelphia: Falmer.
13. Spillane, J. (in progress). Cognition and policy implementation: Local policy-makers and the mathematics reform.
14. Spillane, J. P. (1996). Districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1).
15. Spillane, J. P. (1998a). A cognitive perspective on the LEA's role in implementing instructional policy: Accounting for local variability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(1), 31-57.
16. Spillane, J. (1998b). The progress of standards-based reforms and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 63-87.
17. Stake, J. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Boston: Little, Brown.
19. Thompson, C. L., Spillane, J. P., & Cohen, D. K. (1994). The state policy system affecting science and mathematics education in Michigan. Michigan Statewide Systemic Initiative Policy and Program Review Component.
20. U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Goals 2000: Educate America Act. Washington, DC: Author.
21. Weiss, J. A. (1990). Ideas and inducements in mental health. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(2), 1-23.
22. Wilson, S. M., Peterson, P. L., Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Learning by all. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 468-476.
23. Zeigler, L., & Jennings, M. (1974). Governing American schools: Political interaction in local school districts. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.