Practice effects on the different-hand reaction time advantage for a two-choice task

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 225-234

  Hart, M A ^a   Reeve, T G ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844454414     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ALAIN, C., BUCKOLZ, E. AND TAKTAK, K. (1993). Same-hand and different-hand finger pairings in two-choice reaction time: Presence or absence of response competition? Journal of Motor Behavior, 25: 45-51.
2. FISCHMAN, M. G. AND LIM, C. H. (1991). Influence of extended practice on programming time, movement time, and transfer in simple target-striking responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23: 39-50.
3. FISCHMAN, M. G. AND YAO, W. X. (1994). Programming time and movement time as a function of unequal distributions of practice. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 26: 25-34.
4. HASBROUCQ, T., AKAMATSU, M., MOURET, I. AND SEAL, J. (1995). Finger pairing in two choice reaction time tasks: Does the between-hands advantage reflect response preparation? Journal of Motor Behavior, 27: 251-262.
5. HENRY, F. M. AND ROGERS, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a "memory drum" theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31: 448-458.
6. KLAPP, S.T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21: 1015-1027.
7. KLAPP, S. T. (1996). Reaction time analysis of central motor control. In Advances in motor learning and control. (Edited by H.N. Zelaznik) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 13-36.
8. KORNBLUM, S. (1965). Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 2: 55-56.
9. MILLER, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8: 273-296.
10. PROCTOR, R. W. AND REEVE, T. G. (1988). The acquisition of task-specific productions and modification of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117: 182-196.
11. PROCTOR, R. W., REEVE, T. G., WEEKS, D. J., DORNIER, L. AND VAN ZANDT, T. (1991). Acquisition, retention, and transfer of response selection skill in choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17: 497-506.
12. REEVE, T. G. AND PROCTOR, R. W. (1984). On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10: 541-553.
13. REEVE, T. G. AND PROCTOR, R. W. (1988). Determinants of two-choice reaction-time patterns for same-hand and different-hand finger pairings. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20: 317-340.
14. ROSENBAUM, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
15. ROSENBAUM, D. A. AND KORNBLUM, S. (1982). A priming method for investigating the selection of motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 51: 223-243.
16. SCHMIDT, R. A. (1991). Motor Learning & Performance: From Principles to Practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
17. SCHNEIDER, W. (1995). MEL Professional User's Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.