Grade 6 students' preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 89-112

  Swafford, Jane O ^a   Langrall, Cynthia W ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Algebra; Children's strategies; Functions; Middle grades, 5 8; Prealgebra; Problem solving; Reasoning; Representations, modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 22844453992     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/749821     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Algebraic thinking: Opening the gate. (1997). Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2 (4).
2. Arzarello, F. (1992). Pre-algebra problem solving. In J. P. Ponte, J. F. Matos, J. M. Matos, & D. Fernandes (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving and new information technologies (NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 89, pp. 155-166). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
3. Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem-solving tool: Continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115-136). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
4. Boero, P., & Shapiro, L. (1992). On some factors influencing students' solutions in multiple operations problems: Results and interpretations. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixteenth PME conference (Vol. 1, pp. 89-96). Durham, NH: Program Committee of the 16th PME Conference.
5. Booth, L. R. (1984). Alge bra: Children's strategies and errors: A report of the strategies and errors in secondary mathematics project. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
6. Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179-202.
7. Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25-41). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Edwards, E. L., Jr. (Ed.). (1990). Algebra for everyone. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403-434.
10. Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9 (2), 19-25.
11. Gallardo, A., & Rojano, T. (1987). Common difficulties in the learning of algebra among children displaying low and medium pre-algebraic proficiency levels. In J. C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics, & C. Kieran (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 301-307). Montreal, Canada: University of Montreal.
12. Herscovics, N., & Chalouh, L. (1984). Using literal symbols to represent hidden quantities. In J. M. Moser (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth annual meeting of PME-NA (pp. 64-70). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
13. Herscovics, N., & Kieran, C. (1980). Constructing meaning for the concept of equation. Mathematics Teacher, 73, 572-580.
14. Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59-78.
15. Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, A. T. (1997). A framework for assessing and nurturing young children's thinking in probability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 101-125.
16. Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogul, A. T. (1999). Using students' probabilistic thinking in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 487-519.
17. Kaput, J. J. (1989). Linking representation in the symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 167-194). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Kieran, C. (1979). Children's operational thinking within the context of bracketing and the order of operations. In D. Tall (Ed.), Proceedings of the third international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 128-133). Coventry, England: Mathematics Education Research Centre, Warwick University.
19. Kieran, C. (1984). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the equation-solving errors of algebra novices. In B. Southwell, R. Eyland, M. Cooper, J. Conroy, & K. Collis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 70-77). Sydney, Australia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
20. Kieran, C., Garançon, M., Boileau, A., & Pelletier, M. (1988). Numerical approaches to algebra problem solving in a computer environment. In M. J. Behr, C. B. Lacampagne, & M. M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 141-149). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.
21. Küchemann, D. (1978). Children's understanding of numerical variables. Mathematics in School, 7, 23-26.
22. Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In K. M. Hart (Ed.), Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16 (pp. 102-119). London: John Murray.
23. Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children's thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 41-61.
24. Lee, L. (1996). An initiation into algebraic culture through generalization activities. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 87-106). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
25. Lubinski, C. A., & Otto, A. D. (1997). Literature and algebraic reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 3, 290-295.
26. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 16-32.
27. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65-86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
30. Peck, D. M., & Jencks, S. M. (1988). Reality, arithmetic, algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 85-91.
31. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15-39.
32. Sutherland, R., & Rojano, T. (1993). A spreadsheet approach to solving algebra problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 353-383.
33. Thompson, F. M. (1988). Algebraic instruction for the younger child. In A. F. Coxford (Vol. Ed.) & A. P. Shulte (Series Ed.), The ideas of algebra, K-12. 1988 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 69-77). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
34. Wagner, S. (1981). Conservation of equation and function under transformations of variable. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 107-118.