Development and evaluation of a mini core collection for the U.S. peanut germplasm collection

Crop Science

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1540-1544

  Holbrook, C Corley ^a   Dong, Weibo ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; CERCOSPORIDIUM PERSONATUM;

EID: 22844452481     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0368     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chiteka, Z.A., D.W. Gorbet, F.M. Shokes, T.A. Kucharek, and D.A. Knauft. 1988. Components of resistance to late leafspot in peanut. I. Levels and variability-Implications for selection. Peanut Sci. 15:25-30.
2. Culbreath, A.K., J.W. Todd, D.W. Gorbet, F.M. Shokes, and H.R. Pappu. 1997. Field response of new peanut cultivar UF 91108 to tomato spotted wilt virus. Plant Dis. 81:1410-1415.
3. Daykin, M.E., and R.S. Hussey. 1985. Staining and histopathological techniques in nematology, p. 39-48. In K. R. Barker et al. (ed.) Genetic manipulation: Impact on man and society. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Frankel, O.H. 1984. Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. p. 161-170. In W. K. Arber et al. (ed.) Genetic manipulation: Impact on man and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Frankel, O.H., and A.H.D. Brown. 1984. Current plant genetic resources - A critical appraisal, p. 1-11. In Genetics: New frontiers Vol. VI. Oxford & IBH Publ. Co., New Delhi.
6. Holbrook, C.C. 1999. Testing and utilization of a core collection for the U.S. germplasm collection of peanut. p. 68-73. In R. C. Johnson and T. Hodgkin (ed.) Core collections for today and tomorrow. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.
7. Holbrook, C.C., and W.F. Anderson. 1995. Evaluation of a core collection to identify resistance to late leafspot in peanut. Crop Sci. 35:1700-1702.
8. Holbrook, C.C., W.F. Anderson, and R.N. Pittman. 1993. Selection of a core collection from the U. S. germplasm collection of peanut. Crop Sci. 33:859-861.
9. Holbrook, C.C., and T.G. Isleib. 2001. Geographical distribution of genetic diversity in Arachis hypogaea. Peanut Sci. 28:80-84.
10. Holbrook, C.C., D.A. Knauft, and D.W. Dickson. 1983. A technique for screening peanut for resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria. Plant Dis. 67:957-958.
11. Holbrook, C.C., M.E. Matheron, D.M. Wilson, W.F. Anderson, M.E. Will, and A.J. Norden. 1994. Development of a large-scale field system for screening peanut for resistance to preharvest aflatoxin contamination. Peanut Sci. 21:20-22.
12. Holbrook, C.C., and H.T. Stalker. 2003. Peanut breeding and genetic resources. In J. Janick (ed.) Plant Breed. Rev. Vol. 22:297-356.
13. Holbrook, C.C., M.G. Stephenson, and A.W. Johnson. 2000a. Level and geographical distribution of resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in the U.S. peanut germplasm collection. Crop Sci. 40:1168-1171.
14. Holbrook, C.C., P. Timper, and H.Q. Xue. 2000b. Evaluation of the core collection approach for identifying resistance to Meloidogyne arenaria in peanut. Crop Sci. 40:1172-1175.
15. Hussey, R.S., and K.R. Barker. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula for Meloidogyne spp., including a new technique. Plant Dis. Rep. 57:1025-1028.
16. Knauft, D.A., D.W. Gorbet, and A.J. Norden. 1988. Yield and market quality of seven peanut genotypes grown without leafspot control. Peanut Sci. 15:9-13.
17. Pittman, R.N. 1995. United States peanut descriptors. ARS-132, USDA-ARS. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washingtn, DC.
18. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS Online Doc. Version 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
19. Strickberger, M.W. 1976. Genetics. 2nd ed. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York.
20. Taylor, A.L., and J.N. Sasser. 1978. Biology, identification and control of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species). North Carolina State Univ. Graphics, Raleigh, NC.
21. Trucksess, M.W., M.E. Stack, S. Nexheim, S.W. Page, R.H. Albert, T.J. Hansen, and K.F. Donahue. 1991. Immunoaffinity column coupled with solution fluorometry or liquid chromatography post-column derivitization for determining aflatoxin in corn, peanuts and peanut butter: Collaborative study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 74:81-88.
22. Upadhyaya, H.D., P.J. Bramel, R. Ortiz, and S. Singh. 2002. Developing a mini core of peanut for utilization of genetic resources. Crop Sci. 42:2150-2156.
23. Upadhyaya, H.D., and R. Ortiz. 2001. A mini core subset for capturing diversity and promoting utilization of chickpea genetic resources in crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:1292-1298.
24. Upadhyaya, H.D., R. Ortiz, P.J. Bramel, and S. Singh. 2003. Development of a groundnut core collection using taxonomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 50:139-148.
25. Will, M.E., C.C. Holbrook, and D.M. Wilson. 1994. Evaluation of field inoculation techniques for screening of peanut genotypes for reaction to preharvest A. flavus group infection and aflatoxin contamination. Peanut Sci. 21:122-125.