Patch testing with p-toluene diamine preparations of different ages

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 75-79

  Geier, Johannes ^a,d   Lessmann, Holger ^a   Schnuch, Axel ^a   Hildebrandt, Stephan ^b   Uxer, Wolfgang ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b University of Erlangen/Nürnberg ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^d IVDK an der Universitäts Hautklinik   (Germany)

Author keywords

p toluene diamine; Patch testing; PTD; Quality control; Reproducibility of patch tests

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; DIAMINE DERIVATIVE; DYE; P TOLUENE DIAMINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; BATCH PROCESS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATCH TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DERMATITIS, CONTACT; DIAMINES; DRUG STABILITY; HUMANS; PATCH TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; TOLUENE;

EID: 22844446927     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00646.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Uter W, Geier J, Schnuch A. Current pattern and trends in sensitization to hairdressers allergens in Germany. Dermatologie Beruf Umwelt 2000: 48: 55-59.
2. Uter W, Lessmann H, Geier J, Schnuch A. Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and clients - an 8-year analysis of IVDK Data. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 49: 236-240.
3. Schnuch A, Aberer W, Agathos M, Brasch J, Frosch P J, Fuchs Th, Richter G für die Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe. Leitlinien der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG) zur Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen. Hautarzt 2001: 52: 864-866.
4. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Frosch P J. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The Information Network Departments Dermatology (IVDK) Germany. Eur J Dermatol 1998: 8: 36-40.
5. Uter W, Schnuch A, Gefeller O. Guidelines for the descriptive presentation and statistical analysis of contact allergy data. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 51: 47-56.
6. Lindelöf B. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber™ patch tests in 220 consecutive patients. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 288-289.
7. Breit R, Agathos M. Qualitätskontrolle der Epikutantestung - Reproduzierbarkeit im Rechts-Links-Vergleich. Hautarzt 1992: 43: 417-421.
8. Brasch J, Henseler T, Aberer W, Bäuerle G, Frosch P J, Fuchs T, Fünfstück U, Kaiser G. Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left- versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994: 31: 584-591.
9. Bourke J F, Batta K, Prais L, Abdullah A, Foulds I. The reproducibility of patch tests. Br J Dermatol 1999: 140: 102-105.
10. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Brasch J. Zur Reproduzierbarkeit der Epikutantestung. Die Bewertung der Konkordanz bei synchroner Applikation. Allergologie 2002: 25: 415-419.
11. Dooms-Goossens A, Scheper R J, Andersen K E, Burrows D, Camarasa J G, Frosch P J, Lahti A, Wilkinson J. Comparative patch testing with PPD-base and PPD-dihydrochloride: human and animal data compiled by the European Environmental Contact Dermatitis Research Group. In: Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis, Frosch P F, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft R J G, Scheper R J (eds.), Berlin Heidelberg, Springer, 1989: 281-285.
12. Peters K-P, Frosch P J, Uter W, Schnuch A, Arnold R, Bahmer F, Brasch J, Diepgen T L. Type IV-Allergien auf Friseurberufsstoffe. Dermatosen Beruf Umwelt 1994: 42: 50-57.